Abstract | Abstract Nearly zero energy building (NZEB) requires the training of millions of construction workers and significant upgrading of vocational education and training (VET) systems across the European Union. The article shows how an approach to VET based only on learning outcomes and targeting specific skills is too narrow and lacking in depth to allow for the systematic application of theoretical low energy construction (LEC) knowledge to practice and the development of NZEB expertise in the workplace. Theoretically broader, deeper, more technical and inter-disciplinary expertise is needed to build to (LEC) standards and meet European Performance in Buildings Directive (EPBD) targets. Instead VET for LEC has been largely confined to short and task-specific continuing VET (CVET) courses, illustrated in the cases of Slovenia and Ireland and ranging from a narrow, learning outcomes approach to a broader, standards-based one linking theoretical considerations to specific applications. Mainstreaming the knowledge, skills and competences required for NZEB into initial VET (IVET) curricula is rare. Though less successful in Finland, it is achieved in Belgian construction IVET, which takes a standards-based approach, successfully embeds LEC elements and seeks to overcome occupational boundaries and develop a holistic understanding of the construction process. Policy and practice relevance The emphasis on a standards-, as opposed to a learning outcomes-based, approach to VET for LEC is of relevance to VET practitioners and policy-makers alike, especially given the preoccupation across Europe just with developing specific ‘skills’ through CVET. Broader construction occupational profiles and qualifications are essential for the cross-occupational knowledge and coordination required for successful NZEB, implying a transformation and upgrading of VET systems in many countries. The examples given from Irish CVET and from Belgian IVET are in this respect valuable in showing what can be done to incorporate LEC elements. In highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of different VET systems in meeting NZEB requirements, the article is relevant too for industry and unions in illustrating the significance of social partnership, the need to overcome the fragmentation of the construction process, and the high-quality VET essential to addressing climate change. |
---|