Explaining party cohesion and discipline in democratic legislatures: purposiveness and contexts

Owens, J. 2003. Explaining party cohesion and discipline in democratic legislatures: purposiveness and contexts. Journal of Legislative Studies. 9 (4), pp. 12-40.

TitleExplaining party cohesion and discipline in democratic legislatures: purposiveness and contexts
AuthorsOwens, J.
Abstract

Legislative party discipline and cohesion are important phenomena in the study of political systems. Unless assumptions are made that parties are cohesive and act as unified collectivities with reasonably well-defined goals, it is really difficult, if not impossible, to consider their electoral and legislative roles usefully. But levels of legislative party cohesiveness are also important because they provide us with crucial information about how legislatures/ parliaments function and how they interact with executives/governments. Without cohesive (or disciplined) parties,1 government survival in parliamentary systems is threatened because executive and legislative powers are fused while in separated systems presidents' bases of legislative support become less stable. How do we explain varying levels of legislative party cohesion? The first part of this article draws on the purposive literature to explore the benefits and costs to legislators in democratic legislatures of joining and acting collectively and individualistically within political parties. This leads on to a discussion of various conceptual and empirical problems encountered in analysing intra-party cohesion and discipline in democratic legislatures on plenary votes. Finally, the article reviews the extant empirical evidence on how a multiplicity of systemic, party-levels and situational factors supposedly impact cohesion/discipline levels. The article ends with a discussion of the possibilities and limitations of building comparative models of cohesion/discipline.

JournalJournal of Legislative Studies
Journal citation9 (4), pp. 12-40
ISSN1357-2334
Year2003
PublisherTaylor & Francis
FileOwens_2003_final.pdf
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1080/1357233042000306236
Publication dates
Published01 Jan 2003

Related outputs

Rethinking crises and the accretion of executive power: the “War on Terror” and conditionality evidence from seven political systems
Owens, J. and Pelizzo, R. 2013. Rethinking crises and the accretion of executive power: the “War on Terror” and conditionality evidence from seven political systems. Asian Politics & Policy. 5 (3), pp. 321-336.

The resilience of democratic institutions in Britain, Australia and the United States under conditions of total war
Owens, J. 2012. The resilience of democratic institutions in Britain, Australia and the United States under conditions of total war. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 66 (3), pp. 330-348.

Introduction: the impact of the 'War on Terror' on executive–legislative relations: a global perspective
Owens, J. and Pelizzo, R. 2009. Introduction: the impact of the 'War on Terror' on executive–legislative relations: a global perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 15 (2-3), pp. 119-146.

Congressional responses to the incoming Obama administration: continuity and change
Owens, J.E. 2009. Congressional responses to the incoming Obama administration: continuity and change. Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. New Orleans, LA 06 - 11 Jan 2009

Bush and the Congress in the US "war on terror": rivals only sometimes
Owens, J.E. 2009. Bush and the Congress in the US "war on terror": rivals only sometimes. Conference on Assessing George W. Bush’s Legacy. Eccles Centre for American Studies (British Library) and Institute for the Study of the Americas (University of London), British Library, London 01 Mar 2009

Congressional acquiescence to presidentialism in the US ‘War on Terror’
Owens, J. 2009. Congressional acquiescence to presidentialism in the US ‘War on Terror’. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 15 (2-3), pp. 147-190.

Partisan polarization, procedural control, and partisan emulation in the U.S. House: an explanation of rules restrictiveness over time
Owens, J. and Wrighton, J.M. 2008. Partisan polarization, procedural control, and partisan emulation in the U.S. House: an explanation of rules restrictiveness over time. History of Congress Conference. George Washington University, Washington DC 29 May - 01 Jun 2008

Explaining congressional acquiescence in the US "war on terror"
Owens, J.E. 2008. Explaining congressional acquiescence in the US "war on terror". The Impact of the Post 9/11 WOT on Executive-Legislative Relations: A Global Perspective. Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland 17 - 18 Mar 2008

Bicameralism, strategic interaction and lawmaking within the contemporary congress: the US House and Senate in an era of polarised partisanship
Owens, J.E. 2008. Bicameralism, strategic interaction and lawmaking within the contemporary congress: the US House and Senate in an era of polarised partisanship. Bicameralism: Australia in Comparative Context. Parliament House, Canberra 09 - 10 Oct 2008

Qualified exceptionalism: the US Congress in comparative perspective
Owens, J. and Loomis, B.A. 2007. Qualified exceptionalism: the US Congress in comparative perspective. Journal of Legislative Studies. 12 (3-4), pp. 258-290.

Presidential power and congressional acquiescence in the "war" on terrorism: a new constitutional equilibrium?
Owens, J. 2006. Presidential power and congressional acquiescence in the "war" on terrorism: a new constitutional equilibrium? Politics & Policy. 34 (2), pp. 258-303.

Institutional competition and conflict in a separated system: the Congress, the Presidency and the Courts at the beginning of the 21st century
Owens, J. 2005. Institutional competition and conflict in a separated system: the Congress, the Presidency and the Courts at the beginning of the 21st century. Revue Francaise d'Etudes Americaines. 106, pp. 99-127.

Late twentieth century congressional leaders as shapers of and hostages to political context: Gingrich, Hastert, and Lott
Owens, J. 2002. Late twentieth century congressional leaders as shapers of and hostages to political context: Gingrich, Hastert, and Lott. Politics & Policy. 30 (2), pp. 236-281.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/93901/explaining-party-cohesion-and-discipline-in-democratic-legislatures-purposiveness-and-contexts


Share this
Tweet
Email