Time for Reflection? Considering the "Past", "Present" and "Future" of Feminist Legal Scholarship: A Roundtable Discussion

Bhandar, B., Chryssostalis, J.H., Loizidou, E. and Richardson, J. 2011. Time for Reflection? Considering the "Past", "Present" and "Future" of Feminist Legal Scholarship: A Roundtable Discussion. feminists@law. 1 (1).

TitleTime for Reflection? Considering the "Past", "Present" and "Future" of Feminist Legal Scholarship: A Roundtable Discussion
AuthorsBhandar, B., Chryssostalis, J.H., Loizidou, E. and Richardson, J.
Abstract

In his "Theses On the Philosophy of History" (1940), Walter Benjamin called for a blasting open of the continuum of history. His call was one that would bring into question teleological narratives of progress, and urge a radical rethinking of the concept of the “present”. Similarly, Judith Jack Halberstam considers the ability of new temporal logics to “open up new life narratives and alternative relations to time and space” (2005). Though differently conceptualised, these insights from Benjamin and Halberstam make poignant interventions on the pitfalls of unreflective time, and the political possibilities of imagining a new temporality. What do such insights mean for feminist legal studies? Has an orientation towards a "future" feminist ideal been productive in feminist legal scholarship and activism? How does your own work engage with temporality? Does a reconceptualization of time offer any insight for your work, or for feminist legal projects more generally? Discussion of these questions intends to interrogate what is often taken for granted as "progress" within the field, and to consider the benefits and drawbacks of thinking feminist research and activism inside or outside (or indeed of deploying this dualism in the first place) the domain of chronological time.

This Roundtable Discussion was recorded at the PECANS (Postgraduate and Early Career Academics Network) conference, 'Transgressing Power(s)', held at the University of Westminster, UK, on 30 April 2010. It was organised by Stacy Douglas and chaired by Sarah Keenan.

Journalfeminists@law
Journal citation1 (1)
ISSN2046-9551
Year2011
Publisherfeminists@law, Kent Law School
Web address (URL)http://journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/feministsatlaw/article/view/16
Publication dates
Published2011

Related outputs

Foreword: History, law, space and time
Chryssostalis, J.H. and Drakopoulou, M. 2013. Foreword: History, law, space and time. Australian Feminist Law Journal. 38, p. vii.

Schmitt in South Africa: appropriation and the law of the (post)colony
Chryssostalis, J.H. 2013. Schmitt in South Africa: appropriation and the law of the (post)colony. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly. 64 (2).

Reading Arendt ‘reading’ Schmitt: reading nomos otherwise?
Chryssostalis, J.H. 2013. Reading Arendt ‘reading’ Schmitt: reading nomos otherwise? in: Drakopoulou, M. (ed.) Feminist encounters with legal philosophy Abingdon, Oxon Routledge. pp. 158-184

The work of values: between local and global, national and post-national
Chryssostalis, J.H. 2009. The work of values: between local and global, national and post-national. in: Aziz, M. and Millns, S. (ed.) Values in the Constitution of Europe Dartmouth, UK Ashgate.

The ear of the law and the voice of literature
Chryssostalis, J.H. 2009. The ear of the law and the voice of literature. in: Kravaritou, Y. (ed.) Dikaio kai Techni tou Logou (Law and the Art of Logos) Athens Sakkoulas Publications.

Writing on: Robert Creeley's the death of venus
Chryssostalis, J.H. 2008. Writing on: Robert Creeley's the death of venus. Contemporary Literary Criticism. 266, pp. 139-146.

Athens: the boundless city and the crisis of law
Chryssostalis, J.H. 2007. Athens: the boundless city and the crisis of law. in: Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (ed.) Law and the city Abingdon, UK Routledge-Cavendish. pp. 133-152

The critical instance 'after' the critique of the subject
Chryssostalis, J.H. 2005. The critical instance 'after' the critique of the subject. Law and Critique. 16 (1), pp. 3-25.

Beyond otonomy, or beyond the law of law's ear
Chryssostalis, J.H., Hanafin, P., Gearey, A. and Brooker, J. 2004. Beyond otonomy, or beyond the law of law's ear. Journal of Law & Society. 31 (1), pp. 149-158.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/94x85/time-for-reflection-considering-the-past-present-and-future-of-feminist-legal-scholarship-a-roundtable-discussion


Share this
Tweet
Email