What is universal and what differs in language development?

Forrester, G.S. and Thomas, M.S.C. 2015. What is universal and what differs in language development? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 30 (8), pp. 922-927. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1055281

TitleWhat is universal and what differs in language development?
AuthorsForrester, G.S. and Thomas, M.S.C.
Abstract

Goldin-Meadow (2015) presents an exceptional synthesis of work from studies of children acquiring language under variable circumstances of input or processing abilities. Deaf children who acquire homesign without any well- formed model from which to learn language represent a powerful example. Goldin-Meadow argues that the resilient properties of language that nevertheless emerge include simple syntactic structures, hierarchical organisa- tion, markers modulating the meaning of sentences, and social-communicative functions. Among the fragile or input-dependent properties are the orders that the language follows, the parts into which words are decomposed, and the features that distinguish nominals from predicates. Separation of these two types of properties poses questions concerning the innate constraints on language acquisition (perhaps these equate to the resilient properties) and con‐ cerning the specificity of processes to language (e.g., whether properties such as hierarchical organisation are specific to language or originate in the structure of thought). The study of the resilient properties of human language in the face of adversity and the relation of these properties to the information that is encoded in the human genome represent a research strategy that draws inferences about species universals (properties that all humans share) from data about individual differences (IDs; factors that make humans different from one another). In the following, we suggest three reasons to be cautious about this approach.

JournalLanguage, Cognition and Neuroscience
Journal citation30 (8), pp. 922-927
ISSN2327-3798
Year2015
PublisherRoutledge
Accepted author manuscript
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1055281
Publication dates
Published30 Jun 2015

Related outputs

Motor sensory biases are associated with cognitive and social abilities in humans
Donati, G., Edginton, T.L., Bardo, A., Kivell, T.L., Ballieux, H., Stamate, C. and Forrester, G.S. 2024. Motor sensory biases are associated with cognitive and social abilities in humans. Scientific Reports. 14 (1) 14724. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64372-2

The Precision of the Human Hand: Variability in Pinch Strength and Manual Dexterity
Bardo, A., Town, Katie, Kivell, Tracy L., Donati, Georgina, Ballieux, H., Stamate, C., Edginton, T. and Forrester, Gillian S. 2022. The Precision of the Human Hand: Variability in Pinch Strength and Manual Dexterity. Symmetry. 14 (1) e71. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010071

An analysis of bimanual actions in natural feeding of semi-wild chimpanzees
Forrester, G.S., Rawlings, B. and Davila-Ross, M. 2016. An analysis of bimanual actions in natural feeding of semi-wild chimpanzees. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 159 (1), pp. 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22845

Slip of the tongue: Implications for evolution and language development
Forrester, G.S. and Rodriguez, A. 2015. Slip of the tongue: Implications for evolution and language development. Cognition. 141, pp. 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.012

Social Environment Elicits Lateralized Behaviors in Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Quaresmini, C., Forrester, G.S., Spiezio, C. and Vallortigara, G. 2014. Social Environment Elicits Lateralized Behaviors in Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 128 (3), pp. 276-84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036355

Handedness as a marker of cerebral lateralization in children with and without autism
Forrester, G.S., Pegler, R., Thomas, M.S.C. and Mareschal, D. 2014. Handedness as a marker of cerebral lateralization in children with and without autism. Behavioural Brain Research. 268, pp. 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.03.040

Social environment elicits lateralized navigational paths in two populations of typically developing children
Forrester, G.S., Crawley, M. and Palmer, C. 2014. Social environment elicits lateralized navigational paths in two populations of typically developing children. Brain and Cognition. 91, pp. 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.07.005

Structured bimanual actions and hand transfers reveal population-level right-handedness in captive gorillas
Tabiowo, E. and Forrester, G.S. 2013. Structured bimanual actions and hand transfers reveal population-level right-handedness in captive gorillas. Animal Behaviour. 86 (5), pp. 1049-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.010

Human handedness: an inherited evolutionary trait
Forrester, G.S., Quaresmini, C., Leavens, D.A., Mareschald, D. and Thomas, M.S.C. 2013. Human handedness: an inherited evolutionary trait. Behavioural Brain Research. 237, pp. 200-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.037

The right hand man: manual laterality and language
Forrester, G.S. and Quaresmini, C. 2013. The right hand man: manual laterality and language. in: Csermely, D. and Regolin, L. (ed.) Behavioural lateralization in vertebrates: two sides of a same coin Berlin Heidelberg Springer. pp. 125-141

Target animacy influences chimpanzee handedness
Forrester, G.S., Quaresmini, C., Leavens, D.A., Spiezio, C. and Vallortigara, G. 2012. Target animacy influences chimpanzee handedness. Animal Cognition. 15 (6), pp. 1121-1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0536-4

Target animacy influences gorilla handedness
Forrester, G.S., Leavens, D.A., Quaresmini, C. and Vallortigara, G. 2011. Target animacy influences gorilla handedness. Animal Cognition. 14 (6), pp. 903-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0413-6

A multidimensional approach to investigations of behaviour: revealing structure in animal communication signals
Forrester, G.S. 2008. A multidimensional approach to investigations of behaviour: revealing structure in animal communication signals. Animal Behaviour. 76 (5), pp. 1749-1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.026

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/9711x/what-is-universal-and-what-differs-in-language-development


Share this

Usage statistics

116 total views
260 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.