Interconnectivity and Metacommunication

Bahri, H. and Williams, R. 2017. Interconnectivity and Metacommunication. Training Language and Culture. 1 (3), pp. 8-30.

TitleInterconnectivity and Metacommunication
AuthorsBahri, H. and Williams, R.
Abstract

The study of interpersonal communication touches on a range of different disciplines, each with their own focus. This has given rise to an apparent fragmentation in the literature (O’Keefe, 1993; Craig 1999, Stephen 2014) which is manifested in the categorisation of the various components of a communicative act and even the subdivision of the categories established. This can be seen in the study of metacommunication, which although considered an essential component of human interaction (Andersen, 2009; Wilmot, 1980) has been subdivided into a myriad of constituent parts. Whilst the separation of various components permits detailed focus on different facets of interpersonal interaction there is a risk that the complementarity of the various facets may be underestimated or even lost. Indeed to autonomise each aspect of a communicative act may not be conducive to a comprehensive understanding of what happens in an interaction since all elements, verbal, non-verbal and contextual, to name but a few, need to be considered and interpreted simultaneously. Approaches to the study of metacommunication, whilst being multidimensional, appear to have led to fragmentation. It is our contention that understanding of what constitutes a complete communicative interaction involves the consideration of these various aspects at the same time. Starting from the position that no category exists in a vacuum, and is part and parcel of a whole communicative act, this article draws on Wilmot’s seminal (1980) article among others and considers a more holistic approach to communication as an adjunct to the current tendency for separation. To illustrate this method, the article identifies various aspects and categories within the area of metacommunication and examines the convergence and potential divergence within them. Through the case study of silence as a communicative act that appears to bridge various sub-divisions , this paper argues for an umbrella conceptualisation that unifies rather than compartmentalises the various aspects of metacommunication.

Keywordsmetacommunication, connectivity, interpersonal communication, verbal communication, non-verbal communication, silence in communication
JournalTraining Language and Culture
Journal citation1 (3), pp. 8-30
ISSN2520-2073
Year2017
PublisherICC Language Association/People's Friendship University, Russia
Publisher's versionTLC.ISSUE.3.final.digital(1)-3.pdf
Web address (URL)http://www.icc-languages.eu/component/attachments/download/129
Publication dates
Published06 Oct 2017

Related outputs

Book review: Why English? Confronting the Hydra
Williams, R. 2017. Book review: Why English? Confronting the Hydra. TLC Journal. 2, pp. 116-120.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/q136x/interconnectivity-and-metacommunication


Share this
Tweet
Email