Human Rights Fact-Finding and the CIA's Rendition, Detention and Interrogation Programme: A Response to Cordell

Blakeley, R. and Raphael, S. 2018. Human Rights Fact-Finding and the CIA's Rendition, Detention and Interrogation Programme: A Response to Cordell. International Area Studies Review. 21 (2), pp. 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865917735428

TitleHuman Rights Fact-Finding and the CIA's Rendition, Detention and Interrogation Programme: A Response to Cordell
AuthorsBlakeley, R. and Raphael, S.
Abstract

In her article, ‘Measuring extraordinary rendition and international cooperation’, Rebecca Cordell seeks to subject the Rendition Flights Database to a model-based, statistical analysis. She argues that her analysis suggests that more countries were involved in the CIA’s rendition programme than our work has previously established, and that many more flights in the database are likely to be connected to rendition operations than we have identified. While we would not dispute the likelihood that both of these statements are correct, and we have always presented our findings with an acknowledgement that they provide a necessarily limited account of the rendition, detention and interrogation (RDI) programme, we suggest that Cordell’s work should be approached with some caution. This is so for two reasons. First, her findings – although derived through a different mode of analysis from our own – do not appear to move beyond those we have already published. Second, because Cordell has not triangulated her analysis with either data relating to transfers of specific prisoners, or with evidence relating to which countries hosted prisons for the CIA and the operational dates for these prisons, we question her claim that the flights she has identified from the Database are ‘likely rendition flights’. We aim to demonstrate the importance of having a clear understanding of the limitations of big data when researching violations of human rights, especially where such data is related to covert operations. We also seek to show why the Renditions Flights Database only has merit when it is triangulated with a wide range of supplementary sources, including first-hand accounts by prisoners themselves, declassified documents from the US Government, and the findings of parliamentary, journalist and legal investigations. It is this process of triangulation which gives the flight data meaning and which makes it of value for establishing the facts of human rights abuses.

KeywordsRendition, CIA, human rights fact-finding, the Rendition Project, research, methods
JournalInternational Area Studies Review
Journal citation21 (2), pp. 169-178
ISSN2233-8659
Year2018
PublisherSage
Accepted author manuscript
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865917735428
Publication dates
Published in print01 Jun 2018
Published17 Oct 2017
Published online17 Oct 2017

Related outputs

The Rendition Project
Blakeley, R. and Raphael, S. Forthcoming. The Rendition Project. University of Kent.

Accountability, Denial and the Future - Proofing of British Torture
Raphael, S. and Blakeley, R. 2020. Accountability, Denial and the Future - Proofing of British Torture. International Affairs. 96 (3), p. 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa017

Conducting Effective Research into State Complicity in Human Rights Abuses
Blakeley, R. and Raphael, S. 2020. Conducting Effective Research into State Complicity in Human Rights Abuses. Contemporary Social Science. 15 (2), pp. 196-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2017.1391406

CIA Torture Unredacted
Raphael, S., Black, C. and Blakeley, R. 2019. CIA Torture Unredacted. London The Rendition Project.

The Prohibition against Torture: Why the UK Government is Falling Short and the Risks that Remain
Blakeley, R. and Raphael, S. 2019. The Prohibition against Torture: Why the UK Government is Falling Short and the Risks that Remain. The Political Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12688

British torture in the 'war on terror'
Raphael, S. and Blakeley, R. 2017. British torture in the 'war on terror'. European Journal of International Relations. 23 (2), p. 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116653455

Mercenaries Unleashed: The Brave New World of Private Military and Security Companies
Raphael, S. 2016. Mercenaries Unleashed: The Brave New World of Private Military and Security Companies. War on Want.

Arming Repression: The New British Imperialism in the Persian Gulf
Raphael, S. and St John, J. 2016. Arming Repression: The New British Imperialism in the Persian Gulf. War on Want.

Tracking rendition aircraft as a way to understand CIA secret detention and torture in Europe
Raphael, S., Black, C., Blakeley, R. and Kostas, S. 2016. Tracking rendition aircraft as a way to understand CIA secret detention and torture in Europe. International Journal of Human Rights. 20 (1), pp. 78-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1044772

US Oil Strategy in the Caspian Basin: Hegemony through Interdependence
Raphael, S. and Stokes, D. 2014. US Oil Strategy in the Caspian Basin: Hegemony through Interdependence. International Relations. 28 (2), pp. 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117813517911

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/q2x75/human-rights-fact-finding-and-the-cia-s-rendition-detention-and-interrogation-programme-a-response-to-cordell


Share this

Usage statistics

173 total views
196 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.