Do analysts understand accruals’ persistence? Evidence revisited

Raonic, I. and Sahin, A. 2019. Do analysts understand accruals’ persistence? Evidence revisited. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. 21 (1), pp. 38-59. doi:10.1108/JAAR-07-2018-0103

TitleDo analysts understand accruals’ persistence? Evidence revisited
TypeJournal article
AuthorsRaonic, I. and Sahin, A.
Abstract

We revisit the question of whether analysts anticipate accruals’ predicted reversals (or persistence) of future earnings. Prior evidence shows that analysts are over optimistic with respect to working capital (WC) accruals which is interpreted as their inability to understand accruals’ persistence. Using total accruals (TACC) that in addition to WC accruals cover non-current operating and financing accruals, we show that analysts’ forecast errors are uncorrelated with accruals. We show that analysts’ optimism with respect to accruals is due to the use of an incomplete accrual measure, which does not necessarily indicate analysts’ lack of sophistication. Our results imply that traditional accrual definition should be revised in future studies. The main implication of our finding is that analysts seem to exhibit the necessary sophistication in understanding accruals persistence contrary to suggestions in prior research. Our findings are in line with the idea that any anomalous stock price behaviour related to accruals is not due to analysts’ forecasts, i.e., analysts' earnings forecasts and recommendations should not be considered as the originating source of stock price underreaction or overreaction with respect to accruals.

Keywordsaccrual persistence, analysts’ forecast errors, earnings, forecast efficiency
JournalJournal of Applied Accounting Research
Journal citation21 (1), pp. 38-59
ISSN0967-5426
Year2019
PublisherEmerald
Accepted author manuscript
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1108/JAAR-07-2018-0103
Web address (URL)https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-07-2018-0103
Publication dates
Published02 Dec 2019

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/qy775/do-analysts-understand-accruals-persistence-evidence-revisited


Share this
Tweet
Email

Usage statistics

0 total views
4 total downloads
0 views this month
0 downloads this month
These values are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created

Export as