“Cross-editing”: Comparing News Output Through Journalists’ Re-working of Their Rivals’ Scripts

Marsh, V. 2021. “Cross-editing”: Comparing News Output Through Journalists’ Re-working of Their Rivals’ Scripts. Journalism Studies. 22 (6), pp. 741-759. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1862697

Title“Cross-editing”: Comparing News Output Through Journalists’ Re-working of Their Rivals’ Scripts
TypeJournal article
AuthorsMarsh, V.
Abstract

Newsdesk journalists make thousands of editorial decisions every day without recourse to style guides. They can do this because they have internalised the aims and values of their news organisations: they know what counts as a “good story” for their output. This paper describes a pioneering micro-level comparative method of studying journalistic values in which, unlike in other comparative studies, the journalists themselves perform the initial analysis. In essence, newsdesk editors from two news organisations swap scripts. They evaluate, edit and mark up their rivals’ texts as if they were being asked to use them in their own output. What would they alter, insert or leave out? Would they reject a story completely? This “cross-edit” and the editors’ additional observations represent unmediated analysis from inside the news editing process, allowing researchers to draw comparative conclusions grounded principally in discourse analysis. To pilot the method, a number of journalists from the BBC and China’s official English-language news provider, CCTV-News (now CGTN), cross-edited selected news scripts published by their rivals. The technique shed new light on news routines, lexical choices, omissions and unexpected consonances in news values. It was then refined to provide a framework for future, wider use.

KeywordsCommunication
JournalJournalism Studies
Journal citation22 (6), pp. 741-759
ISSN1461-670X
1469-9699
Year2021
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Accepted author manuscript
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1862697
Publication dates
Published online03 May 2021
Published in print26 Apr 2021

Related outputs

Editorial: Re-evaluating China's global media expansion
Marsh, V. 2018. Editorial: Re-evaluating China's global media expansion. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture. 13 (1), pp. 143-146. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.295

Tiangao or tianxia? The ambiguities of CCTV's English-language news for Africa
Marsh, V. 2018. Tiangao or tianxia? The ambiguities of CCTV's English-language news for Africa. in: Thussu, D.K., de Burgh, H. and Shi, A. (ed.) China's Media Go Global Abingdon Routledge. pp. 103-121

Africa through Chinese eyes: new frames or the same old lens?
Marsh, V. 2016. Africa through Chinese eyes: new frames or the same old lens? in: Bunce, M., Franks, S. and Paterson, C. (ed.) Africa’s media image in the 21st century: From the ‘Heart of Darkness’ to ‘Africa Rising' Abingdon, Oxon. Routledge. pp. 177-189

Mixed messages, partial pictures? Discourses under construction in CCTV’s Africa Live compared with the BBC
Marsh, V. 2016. Mixed messages, partial pictures? Discourses under construction in CCTV’s Africa Live compared with the BBC. Chinese Journal of Communication. 9 (1), pp. 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2015.1105269

Media and Elections in Africa: Conference summary
Marsh, V. 2014. Media and Elections in Africa: Conference summary. Journal of African Media Studies. 6 (2), pp. 231-234. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams.6.2.231_7

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/v4zyq/-cross-editing-comparing-news-output-through-journalists-re-working-of-their-rivals-scripts


Share this
Tweet
Email

Usage statistics

6 total views
3 total downloads
0 views this month
3 downloads this month
These values are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created

Export as