How do institutional gender regimes affect formal reporting processes for sexual harassment? A qualitative study of UK higher education

Bull, A. and Shannon, E.R. 2024. How do institutional gender regimes affect formal reporting processes for sexual harassment? A qualitative study of UK higher education. Law & Policy. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12255

TitleHow do institutional gender regimes affect formal reporting processes for sexual harassment? A qualitative study of UK higher education
TypeJournal article
AuthorsBull, A. and Shannon, E.R.
Abstract

Formal complaints and disciplinary processes constitute a mandatory aspect of organizational responses for addressing sexual harassment in many jurisdictions. However, previous research has found that reporting parties are not well served by such processes. In particular, Ahmed (Complaint!; 2021) argues that the institutional climate that enables harassment or discrimination to occur—including its gendered dynamics—also shapes how complaints about harassment are handled. Building on Ahmed's work, this article analyses how gender “gets into” formal reporting processes for sexual harassment within organizations. It draws on interviews with 18 students and staff who went through a formal institutional reporting process for gender-based violence or harassment in UK higher education between 2016 and 2021. Using Connell's theorization of “gender regimes,” we outline how “dimensions of gender” within organizations affected different stages of formal reporting processes, including how evidence was gathered during reporting processes, as well as how it was assessed. These findings demonstrate that gender regimes—via gender relations of power, gendered “attachments and investments,” and “gender-neutral” processes—can override formal processes and affect outcomes of sexual harassment reporting. These findings explain how gender regimes contribute to the failure of sexual harassment complaints to be upheld within organizations.

JournalLaw & Policy
ISSN1467-9930
0265-8240
Year2024
PublisherWiley
Publisher's version
License
CC BY 4.0
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12255
Web address (URL)https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12255
Publication dates
Published online08 Oct 2024

Related outputs

Unwilling trust: Unpacking the assumption of trust between sexual misconduct reporters and their institutions in UK higher education
Shannon, E.R. and Bull, A. 2024. Unwilling trust: Unpacking the assumption of trust between sexual misconduct reporters and their institutions in UK higher education. Sociology Compass. 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13197

Safeguarding and Agency: Methodological Tensions in Conducting Research with Survivors of Sexual Violence in Universities
Shannon, E.R. 2022. Safeguarding and Agency: Methodological Tensions in Conducting Research with Survivors of Sexual Violence in Universities. Social Sciences. 11 (8) 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080350

Protecting the perpetrator: value judgements in US and English university sexual violence cases
Shannon, E.R. 2022. Protecting the perpetrator: value judgements in US and English university sexual violence cases. Gender and Education. 34 (8), pp. 906-922. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2021.1955093

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/wx6zx/how-do-institutional-gender-regimes-affect-formal-reporting-processes-for-sexual-harassment-a-qualitative-study-of-uk-higher-education


Share this

Usage statistics

5 total views
3 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.