Recognition is deserved, qualifications are merited. Where does that leave fairness in accreditation?

Gibbs, P. and Armsby, P. 2011. Recognition is deserved, qualifications are merited. Where does that leave fairness in accreditation? European Journal of Education. 46 (3), pp. 388-396.

TitleRecognition is deserved, qualifications are merited. Where does that leave fairness in accreditation?
AuthorsGibbs, P. and Armsby, P.
Abstract

This article contextualises the use of accreditation for prior experiential learning (APEL) in European higher education by analysing the notions of desert and merit. We propose that the credentialising of certain types of knowledge can lead to a narrow definition of education which merely endeavours to serve consumer imperatives so as to market the individual in the work place rather than develop the essence of their being. The article advocates judgement not rules, codes or descriptors in making assessments of the worth of the personal and professional knowledge , experience and practices of claimants. We then argue that without such mechanistic criteria desert rather than merit should hold sway in the making of assessments. Moreover, we propose that desert more fairly represents an individual's achievements for the purposes of the owner of the achievement and for those would wish to make decsions based upon them.

JournalEuropean Journal of Education
Journal citation46 (3), pp. 388-396
ISSN0141-8211
YearSep 2011
PublisherWiley
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01487.x
Publication dates
PublishedSep 2011

Related outputs

The design of doctorate curricula for practising professionals
Armsby, P., Costley, C. and Cranfield, S. 2017. The design of doctorate curricula for practising professionals. Studies in Higher Education.

The design of doctorate curricula for practising professionals
Armsby, P., Cranfield, S. and Costley, C. 2017. The design of doctorate curricula for practising professionals. Studies in Higher Education.

Stakeholders and the Design of Doctoral Curricula for Practicing Professionals.
Armsby, P., Costely, C., Cranfield, S. and Costley, C. 2016. Stakeholders and the Design of Doctoral Curricula for Practicing Professionals. Fifth International Conference on Professional Doctorates. Belfast 16 Mar 2016 UK Council for Graduate Education.

Insider Research and Impact on an Institution (University).
Armsby, P. 2016. Insider Research and Impact on an Institution (University). Fifth International Conference on Professional Doctorates. Titanic, Belfast 15 - 16 Mar 2016 UK Council for Graduate Education.

Work-related and professional learning in the curriculum
Coldham, S. and Armsby, P. 2016. Work-related and professional learning in the curriculum. in: Pokorny, H. and Warren, D. (ed.) Enhancing Teaching Practice in Higher Education London Sage. pp. 186-205

Recognising and Accrediting Prior and Experiential Learning
Armsby, P. and Helyer, R. 2015. Recognising and Accrediting Prior and Experiential Learning. in: Helyer, R. (ed.) Facilitating Work Based Learning London Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 94-113

Developing professional learning and identity through the recognition of experiential learning at doctoral level
Armsby, P. 2013. Developing professional learning and identity through the recognition of experiential learning at doctoral level. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 32 (4), pp. 412-429.

The accreditation of prior learning in professional doctorate curricula
Armsby, P. 2012. The accreditation of prior learning in professional doctorate curricula. 3rd International Conference on Professional Doctorates. Florence, Italy. 2 - 3 April 2012

Accreditation of experiential learning at doctoral level
Armsby, P. 2012. Accreditation of experiential learning at doctoral level. Journal of Workplace Learning. 24 (2), pp. 133-150.

CETL for work based learning: enhancing innovation and creativity in teaching and learning
Workman, B., Armsby, P., Durrant, A. and Frame, P. 2011. CETL for work based learning: enhancing innovation and creativity in teaching and learning. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning. 1 (3), pp. 273-288.

Where to next? The shape of doctorates for now and the future
Malloch, M., Armsby, P., Clarke, C., Evans, T. and Sorenson, J. 2011. Where to next? The shape of doctorates for now and the future. Second International Conference on Professional Doctorates. John McIntyre Conference Centre, Edinburgh 20-21 April 2011

Towards a metric for measuring the value of professional doctorates
Armsby, P. and Dreher, M. 2011. Towards a metric for measuring the value of professional doctorates. in: Fell, A., Flint, K. and Haines, I. (ed.) Professional Doctorates in the UK 2011 Lichfield UK Council for Graduate Education.

Designing professional doctorate curricula: the case of Higher Education practitioners
Armsby, P. 2011. Designing professional doctorate curricula: the case of Higher Education practitioners. 7th International Conference on Researching Work and Learning. Shanghai, China 4-7 December 2011

Higher education quality and work-based learning: two concepts not yet fully integrated
Gibbs, P. and Armsby, P. 2010. Higher education quality and work-based learning: two concepts not yet fully integrated. Quality in Higher Education. 16 (2), pp. 185-187.

Developing the coach: using work based learning masters and doctorate programmes to facilitate coaches learning
Armsby, P. and Fillery-Travis, A. 2009. Developing the coach: using work based learning masters and doctorate programmes to facilitate coaches learning. UALL Work Based Learning Network Annual Conference: the Impact of Work Based Learning for the Learner. University of the West of England 13 - 14 Jul 2009

Developing work based learning at doctoral level
Armsby, P. and Costley, C. 2009. Developing work based learning at doctoral level. in: Garnett, J., Costley, C. and Workman, B. (ed.) Work based learning: journeys to the core of higher education London Middlesex University Press. pp. 102-117

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/8zq8z/recognition-is-deserved-qualifications-are-merited-where-does-that-leave-fairness-in-accreditation


Share this
Tweet
Email