Having ones cake and eating it: the paradox of contextualisation in socio-legal research

Banakar, R. 2011. Having ones cake and eating it: the paradox of contextualisation in socio-legal research. International Journal of Law in Context. 7 (4), pp. 487-503.

TitleHaving ones cake and eating it: the paradox of contextualisation in socio-legal research
AuthorsBanakar, R.
Abstract

In Law in Modern Society, Denis Galligan argues that adopting a social scientific perspective, which describes and analyses the law in extra-legal terms, can easily entail losing sight of the law as a distinct social formation. To avoid this pitfall, socio-legal research should contextualise those features of the legal system which are relevant to the actions of citizens and officials of the law. This essay argues that since the “relevant” features described by Galligan are, ultimately, related to legal rules, his approach amounts to a top-down method of contextualising the impact of the law on society and as such loses sight of law’s fluidity and societal embeddedness. Using Galligan’s methodology as its backdrop, this essay sketches the contours of three ideal typical approaches to the contextualisation of law. The first approach examines how social institutions absorb law within their existing networks of rules and relations; the second reverses law’s method of dislodging actions from their socio-historical context; and the third uncovers the socio-cultural and historical embeddedness of the legal system. This paper concludes by arguing that these three approaches reverse the de-contextualising effects of modern Western law in different ways and degrees. Scholars who employ the second and the third approaches often do so as part of their search for alternative forms of law and legality. What is identified by Galligan as losing sight of the distinctiveness of the law should, in their case, be explored in light of the ongoing struggle for law, rather than as the failure of social sciences to account for the specificity of positive law.

JournalInternational Journal of Law in Context
Journal citation7 (4), pp. 487-503
ISSN1744-5523
Year2011
PublisherCambridge University Press
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1017/S1744552311000267
Web address (URL)http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1823394
Publication dates
Published2011

Related outputs

Driving dangerously: law, culture and driving habits in Iran
Banakar, R. and Nasrolahi Fard, S. 2012. Driving dangerously: law, culture and driving habits in Iran. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. 39 (2), pp. 241-257.

The sociology of law: from industrialisation to globalisation
Banakar, R. 2011. The sociology of law: from industrialisation to globalisation. Sociopedia.isa.

Pre-empting terrorism? Two case studies of the UK's anti-terrorism legislation
Banakar, R. 2010. Pre-empting terrorism? Two case studies of the UK's anti-terrorism legislation. in: Banakar, R. (ed.) Rights in context: law and justice in late modern society Farnham Ashgate. pp. 193-214

Law, rights and justice in late modern society: a tentative theoretical framework
Banakar, R. 2010. Law, rights and justice in late modern society: a tentative theoretical framework. in: Banakar, R. (ed.) Rights in context: law and justice in late modern society Farnham Ashgate. pp. 19-40

Introduction: snapshots of the rights discourse
Banakar, R. 2010. Introduction: snapshots of the rights discourse. in: Banakar, R. (ed.) Rights in context: law and justice in late modern society Farnham Ashgate. pp. 1-18

In search of Heimat: a note on Franz Kafka's concept of law
Banakar, R. 2010. In search of Heimat: a note on Franz Kafka's concept of law. Law and Literature. 22 (3), pp. 463-490.

Power, culture and method in comparative law: a review essay of Comparative Law: a Handbook, Esin Orucu & David Nelken, eds., Hart Publishing, 2007
Banakar, R., Orucu, E. and Nelken, D. 2009. Power, culture and method in comparative law: a review essay of Comparative Law: a Handbook, Esin Orucu & David Nelken, eds., Hart Publishing, 2007. International Journal of Law in Context. 5 (1), pp. 69-85.

Law through sociology’s looking glass: conflict and competition in sociological studies of law
Banakar, R. 2009. Law through sociology’s looking glass: conflict and competition in sociological studies of law. in: Denis, A. and Kalekin-Fishman, D. (ed.) The ISA handbook in contemporary sociology London Sage. pp. 58-73

The politics of legal cultures
Banakar, R. 2008. The politics of legal cultures. Retfærd: Nordic Journal of Law and Justice. 31 (4), pp. 37-60.

Whose experience is the measure of justice?
Banakar, R. 2008. Whose experience is the measure of justice? Legal Ethics. 10 (2), pp. 209-222.

The politics of legal cultures
Banakar, R. 2008. The politics of legal cultures. Retfærd: The Nordic Journal of Law and Justice. 31 (4/123), pp. 37-60.

Poetic injustice: a case study of the UK's anti-terrorism legislation
Banakar, R. 2008. Poetic injustice: a case study of the UK's anti-terrorism legislation. Retfærd: The Nordic Journal of Law and Justice. 31 (3/112), pp. 69-90.

Case assignment in English courts
Banakar, R., Flood, J., Webb, J. and Whyte, A. 2007. Case assignment in English courts. in: Langbroek, P.M. and Fabri, M. (ed.) The right judge for each case: a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries Antwerp ; Oxford Intersentia.

Sociological jurisprudence
Banakar, R. 2007. Sociological jurisprudence. in: Clark, D.S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of law and society: American and global perspectives Thousand Island, CA Sage.

Review of D. J. Galligan’s Law in Modern Society
Banakar, R. 2007. Review of D. J. Galligan’s Law in Modern Society. Retfaerd. 30 (3/118), pp. 83-89.

Law, race and ethnicity
Banakar, R. 2007. Law, race and ethnicity. in: Clark, D.S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of law and society: American and global perspectives Thousand Island, CA Sage.

Georges Gurvitch
Banakar, R. 2007. Georges Gurvitch. in: Clark, D.S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of law and society: American and global perspectives Thousand Island, CA Sage.

Review: "A life of H.L.A. Hart: the nightmare of the noble dream, by Nicola Lacey
Banakar, R. 2006. Review: "A life of H.L.A. Hart: the nightmare of the noble dream, by Nicola Lacey. Jurist: Nordic Journal of Law and Practice. 113 (2/29).

Integrating reciprocal perspectives: on Georges Gurvitch's theory of immediate jural experience
Banakar, R. 2006. Integrating reciprocal perspectives: on Georges Gurvitch's theory of immediate jural experience. in: Cotterrell, R. (ed.) Law, culture and society: legal ideas in the mirror of social theory Aldershot, UK Ashgate.

Can sociology and jurisprudence learn from each other? A reply to Mauro Zamboni
Banakar, R. 2006. Can sociology and jurisprudence learn from each other? A reply to Mauro Zamboni. Jurist: Nordic Journal of Law and Practice. 113 (2/29).

Book review of 'Race, law, resistance' by Patricia Tuitt (London, The GlassHouse Press, 2004, 134 pp., £25.00)
Banakar, R. 2005. Book review of 'Race, law, resistance' by Patricia Tuitt (London, The GlassHouse Press, 2004, 134 pp., £25.00). Journal of Law and Society. 32 (4), pp. 648-652.

Internal case assignment in England
Flood, J., Banakar, R., Webb, J. and Whyte, A. 2005. Internal case assignment in England. in: Fabri, M. and Langbroek, P.M. (ed.) Internal case assignment. A report on a comparative study into the rules and practices of case distribution in courts in five countries Utrecht, Netherlands University of Utrecht. pp. 63-134

Book review of 'The policy of law: a legal theoretical framework' by Mauro Zamboni (Stockholm: Stockholm University Press)
Banakar, R. 2005. Book review of 'The policy of law: a legal theoretical framework' by Mauro Zamboni (Stockholm: Stockholm University Press). Retfaerd. 111 (4/28), pp. 82-87.

When do rights matter? A case study of the right to equal treatment in Sweden
Banakar, R. 2004. When do rights matter? A case study of the right to equal treatment in Sweden. in: Halliday, S. and Schmidt, P. (ed.) Human rights brought home: socio-legal perspectives on human rights in the national context Oxford, UK Hart. pp. 165-184

Studying legal texts: introduction to section three
Banakar, R. and Travers, M. 2003. Studying legal texts: introduction to section three. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) Theory and method in socio-legal research Oxford, UK Hart. pp. 133-137

Studying legal cultures: introduction to section five
Banakar, R. and Travers, M. 2003. Studying legal cultures: introduction to section five. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) Theory and method in socio-legal research Oxford, UK Hart. pp. 239-243

Structural approaches: introduction to section four
Banakar, R. and Travers, M. 2003. Structural approaches: introduction to section four. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) Theory and method in socio-legal research Oxford, UK Hart. pp. 195-201

Socio-legal research in the UK: introduction to section six
Banakar, R. and Travers, M. 2003. Socio-legal research in the UK: introduction to section six. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) Theory and method in socio-legal research Oxford, UK Hart. pp. 279-282

Law, sociology and method
Banakar, R. and Travers, M. 2003. Law, sociology and method. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) Theory and method in socio-legal research Oxford, UK Hart. pp. 1-31

Introduction
Banakar, R. and Travers, M. 2003. Introduction. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) Theory and method in socio-legal research Oxford, UK Hart. pp. ix-xvi

Ethnography and law: introduction to section two
Banakar, R. and Travers, M. 2003. Ethnography and law: introduction to section two. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) Theory and method in socio-legal research Oxford, UK Hart. pp. 69-74

Studying cases empirically: a sociological method for studying discrimination cases in Sweden
Banakar, R. 2003. Studying cases empirically: a sociological method for studying discrimination cases in Sweden. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) Theory and method in socio-legal research Oxford, UK Hart. pp. 139-159

Merging law and sociology: beyond the dichotomies in socio-legal research
Banakar, R. 2003. Merging law and sociology: beyond the dichotomies in socio-legal research. Berlin, Germany Galda and Wilch.

Sociological jurisprudence
Banakar, R. 2002. Sociological jurisprudence. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) An introduction to law and social theory Oxford, UK Hart. pp. 33-49

Integrating reciprocal perspectives: on Gurvitch's theory of immediate jural experience
Banakar, R. 2001. Integrating reciprocal perspectives: on Gurvitch's theory of immediate jural experience. Canadian Journal of Law and Society. 16 (1-2), pp. 67-91.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/8zx0x/having-ones-cake-and-eating-it-the-paradox-of-contextualisation-in-socio-legal-research


Share this
Tweet
Email