|Title||Post-transcriptional regulation of alpha-smooth muscle actin determines the contractile phenotype of Dupuytren's nodular cells|
|Authors||Verjee, L.S., Midwood, K., Davidson, D., Eastwood, M. and Nanchahal, J.|
The objective was to study Dupuytren's myofibroblast cells in constrained collagen matrices in order to more closely emulate their in vivo environment and, to correlate their contractility with -smooth muscle actin (-SMA) expression and determine if dermal fibroblasts regulate Dupuytren's myofibroblast phenotype. Isotonic and isometric force contraction by cells isolated from Dupuytren's nodules, palmar and non-palmar skin fibroblasts was measured in collagen matrices. The effect of co-culturing nodule cells with dermal fibroblasts on isometric contraction was examined. Isometric contraction was correlated with levels of -SMA mRNA by pcr and protein by Western blotting, and -SMA distribution assessed by immunofluorescence. Dupuytren's nodule cells exhibited similar levels of isotonic contraction to both palmar and non-palmar dermal fibroblasts. However, nodule cells generated high levels of isometric force (mean: 3.5 dynes/h), which continued to increase over 24 h to a maximum of 173 dynes. In contrast, dermal fibroblasts initially exhibited low levels of contraction (mean: 0.5 dynes/h) and reached tensional homeostasis on average after 15 h (range: 4–20 h), with a maximum force of 52 dynes. Although all three cell types had similar -SMA mRNA levels, increased levels of -SMA protein were observed in nodule cells compared to dermal fibroblasts. -SMA localised to stress fibres in 35% (range: 26–50%) of nodule cells compared to only 3% (range:0–6%) of dermal fibroblasts. Co-cultures of Dupuytren's cells and dermal fibroblasts showed no contractile differences. The contractile phenotype of Dupuytren's myofibroblasts is determined by increased -SMA protein distributed in stress fibres, not by cellular mRNA levels. Dupuytren's cell contractility is not influenced by dermal fibroblasts.
|Journal||Journal of Cellular Physiology|
|Journal citation||224 (3), pp. 681-690|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||doi:10.1002/jcp.22167|