Calculating luminous flux and lighting levels for domesticated mammals and birds

Saunders, J.E., Jarvis, J. and Wathes, C.M. 2008. Calculating luminous flux and lighting levels for domesticated mammals and birds. Animal: the international journal of animal biosciences. 2 (6), pp. 921-932. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108002012

TitleCalculating luminous flux and lighting levels for domesticated mammals and birds
AuthorsSaunders, J.E., Jarvis, J. and Wathes, C.M.
Abstract

This paper considers whether photometric calculations using standard human spectral sensitivity data are satisfactory for applications with other species or whether it would be worthwhile to use bespoke spectral sensitivity functions for each species or group of species. Applications include the lighting of interior areas and the design of photometers. Published spectral sensitivity data for a number of domesticated animals (human, turkey, duck, chicken, cat, rat and mouse) were used to calculate lighting levels for each species and compared with those derived from standard CIE human photopic and scotopic functions. Calculations were made for spectral power distributions of daylight, incandescent light and 12 fluorescent sources commonly used to light interiors. The calculated lighting levels showed clear differences between species and the standard human. Assuming that the resulting effects on retinal illuminance determine the overall perception of the level of light, there may be applications where these differences are important. However, evidence is also presented that the magnitude of these inter-species effects are similar to, or smaller than, those arising from other optical, physiological and psychological factors, which are also likely to influence the resulting perception. It is also important to recognise that lighting-related parameters such as the good colour rendering of surfaces, the avoidance of glare from lamps and other factors that may be species related are sometimes of greater importance than the lighting levels. Our results suggest that a judicial choice of three spectral sensitivity functions would satisfy most circumstances. Firstly, where the overall sensitivity is maximal in the medium to long wavelengths, the standard CIE photopic function will suffice, chicken, turkey and duck fall in this category. Secondly, in a small number of cases where the sensitivity centres on the short to medium wavelengths, the CIE scotopic function should be used, e.g. for the scotopic cat, photopic rat and photopic mouse. Finally, where an animal is also sensitive to the UV region of the spectrum and there is a significant component of UV radiation, then an additional measure of the UV response should be included, as for the photopic rat and photopic mouse.

JournalAnimal: the international journal of animal biosciences
Journal citation2 (6), pp. 921-932
ISSN1751-7311
YearJun 2008
PublisherCambridge University Press
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108002012
Publication dates
PublishedJun 2008

Related outputs

Bridging the Gap Between Imaging Performance and Image Quality Measures
Fry, E., Triantaphillidou, S., Jacobson, R., Jarvis, J. and Fagard-Jenkin, R. 2018. Bridging the Gap Between Imaging Performance and Image Quality Measures. IS&T Electronic Imaging Symposium 2018 - Image Quality System Performance XV. San Francisco, CA, USA 28 Jan - 01 Feb 2018 The Society of Imaging Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2018.12.IQSP-231

Image quality optimization, via application of contextual contrast sensitivity and discrimination functions
Fry, E., Triantaphillidou, S., Jarvis, J. and Gupta, G. 2015. Image quality optimization, via application of contextual contrast sensitivity and discrimination functions. SPIE Electronic Imaging: Image Quality and System Performance XII. San Fransisco Jan 2015 SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2082937

Contrast sensitivity and discrimination in pictorial images
Triantaphillidou, S., Jarvis, J. and Gupta, G. 2014. Contrast sensitivity and discrimination in pictorial images. SPIE Electronic Imaging: Image Quality and System Performance XI. San Francisco, USA Jan 2014 SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2040007

Defining human contrast sensitivity and discrimination from complex imagery
Triantaphillidou, S., Jarvis, J., Gupta, G. and Rana, H. 2013. Defining human contrast sensitivity and discrimination from complex imagery. in: SPIE proceedings: Optics and Photonics for Counterterrorism, Crime Fighting and Defence IX; and Optical Materials and Biomaterials in Security and Defence Systems Technology X, 89010C SPIE.

Contrast sensitivity and discrimination of complex scenes
Triantaphillidou, S., Jarvis, J. and Gupta, G. 2013. Contrast sensitivity and discrimination of complex scenes. in: Burns, P.D. and Triantaphillidou, S. (ed.) Image Quality and System Performance X SPIE.

Mechanistic modeling of vertebrate spatial contrast sensitivity and acuity at low luminance
Jarvis, J. and Wathes, C.M. 2012. Mechanistic modeling of vertebrate spatial contrast sensitivity and acuity at low luminance. Visual Neuroscience. 29 (3), pp. 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952523812000120

Stimulus luminance and the spatial acuity of domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus)
Gover, N., Jarvis, J., Abeyesinghe, S.M. and Wathes, C.M. 2009. Stimulus luminance and the spatial acuity of domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus). Vision Research: an international journal for functional aspects of vision. 49 (23), pp. 2747-2753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.011

Measuring and modelling the spatial contrast sensitivity of the chicken (Gallus g. domesticus)
Jarvis, J., Abeyesinghe, S.M., McMahon, C.E. and Wathes, C.M. 2009. Measuring and modelling the spatial contrast sensitivity of the chicken (Gallus g. domesticus). Vision Research: an international journal for functional aspects of vision. 49 (11), pp. 1448-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.019

A mechanistic inter-species comparison of spatial contrast sensitivity
Jarvis, J. and Wathes, C.M. 2008. A mechanistic inter-species comparison of spatial contrast sensitivity. Vision Research: an international journal for functional aspects of vision. 48 (21), pp. 2284-2292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.002

On the calculation of optical performance factors from vertebrate spatial contrast sensitivity
Jarvis, J. and Wathes, C.M. 2007. On the calculation of optical performance factors from vertebrate spatial contrast sensitivity. Vision Research: an international journal for functional aspects of vision. 47 (17), pp. 2259-2271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.015

Light, vision and the welfare of poultry
Prescott, N.B., Wathes, C.M. and Jarvis, J. 2003. Light, vision and the welfare of poultry. Animal Welfare. 12 (2), pp. 269-288.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/9125z/calculating-luminous-flux-and-lighting-levels-for-domesticated-mammals-and-birds


Share this

Usage statistics

123 total views
0 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.