What falls foul of the Enterprise Act 2002's cartel offence that is not caught by a common law conspiracy to defraud?

The European arrest warrant and detention
Lazowski, A. and Nash, S. 2009. The European arrest warrant and detention. in: Keijzer, N. and van Sliedregt, E. (ed.) The European arrest warrant in practice Cambridge Cambridge University Press. pp. 33-50

Human rights update
Nash, S. 2007. Human rights update. New Law Journal. 157 (7299), pp. 1690-1691.

Human rights update
Nash, S. 2007. Human rights update. New Law Journal. 157 (7291), pp. 1384-1385.

Human rights update
Nash, S. 2007. Human rights update. New Law Journal. 157 (7279), pp. 932-933.

Human rights update
Nash, S. 2007. Human rights update. New Law Journal. 157 (7262), pp. 236-327.

Improperly obtained evidence in the Commonwealth: lessons for England and Wales?
Choo, A.L.T. and Nash, S. 2007. Improperly obtained evidence in the Commonwealth: lessons for England and Wales? International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 11 (2), pp. 75-105.

International criminal law. 3rd edition
Bantekas, I. and Nash, S. 2007. International criminal law. 3rd edition. London ; New York Routledge-Cavendish.

Special advocacy: political expediency and legal roles in modern judicial systems
Nash, S. and Boon, A. 2006. Special advocacy: political expediency and legal roles in modern judicial systems. Legal Ethics. 9 (1), pp. 101-124.

Human rights law debate
Nash, S. 2006. Human rights law debate. New Law Journal. 156 (7229), pp. 984-985.

Torture: a legitimate interrogation technique or a gross violation of human rights
Nash, S. 2005. Torture: a legitimate interrogation technique or a gross violation of human rights. in: Gehl, G. (ed.) Folter - zulassiges Instrument im Strafrecht?: ein internationaler Vergleich Bertuch. pp. 125-132

Recent developments in English criminal law and procedure
Nash, S. 2005. Recent developments in English criminal law and procedure. Criminal Law Journal. 29 (4), pp. 228-236.

Case note: Drawing inferences from positive suggestions put to witnesses: R v Webber
Nash, S. 2005. Case note: Drawing inferences from positive suggestions put to witnesses: R v Webber. International Journal of Evidence of Proof. 9 (1), pp. 50-54.

The cartel offence
Furse, M. and Nash, S. 2004. The cartel offence. Oxford, UK Hart.

Partners in crime: the UK cartel offence
Furse, M. and Nash, S. 2004. Partners in crime: the UK cartel offence. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 15 (5), pp. 138-153.

Evidence law in England and Wales: the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998
Choo, A.L.T. and Nash, S. 2003. Evidence law in England and Wales: the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998. International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 7 (1), pp. 31-61.