Case note: Drawing inferences from positive suggestions put to witnesses: R v Webber
Nash, S. 2005. Case note: Drawing inferences from positive suggestions put to witnesses: R v Webber. International Journal of Evidence of Proof. 9 (1), pp. 50-54.
Nash, S. 2005. Case note: Drawing inferences from positive suggestions put to witnesses: R v Webber. International Journal of Evidence of Proof. 9 (1), pp. 50-54.
Title | Case note: Drawing inferences from positive suggestions put to witnesses: R v Webber |
---|---|
Authors | Nash, S. |
Journal | International Journal of Evidence of Proof |
Journal citation | 9 (1), pp. 50-54 |
ISSN | 1365-7127 |
Year | 2005 |
Publication dates | |
Published | 2005 |
The European arrest warrant and detention
Lazowski, A. and Nash, S. 2009. The European arrest warrant and detention. in: Keijzer, N. and van Sliedregt, E. (ed.) The European arrest warrant in practice Cambridge Cambridge University Press. pp. 33-50
Human rights update
Nash, S. 2007. Human rights update. New Law Journal. 157 (7299), pp. 1690-1691.
Human rights update
Nash, S. 2007. Human rights update. New Law Journal. 157 (7291), pp. 1384-1385.
Human rights update
Nash, S. 2007. Human rights update. New Law Journal. 157 (7279), pp. 932-933.
Human rights update
Nash, S. 2007. Human rights update. New Law Journal. 157 (7262), pp. 236-327.
Improperly obtained evidence in the
Commonwealth: lessons for England and Wales?
Choo, A.L.T. and Nash, S. 2007. Improperly obtained evidence in the
Commonwealth: lessons for England and Wales? International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 11 (2), pp. 75-105.
International criminal law. 3rd edition
Bantekas, I. and Nash, S. 2007. International criminal law. 3rd edition. London ; New York Routledge-Cavendish.
What falls foul of the Enterprise Act 2002's cartel offence
that is not caught by a common law conspiracy to defraud?
Nash, S. and Furse, M. 2006. What falls foul of the Enterprise Act 2002's cartel offence
that is not caught by a common law conspiracy to defraud? New Law Journal. 156 (7224), pp. 780-781.
Special advocacy: political expediency and legal roles in modern judicial systems
Nash, S. and Boon, A. 2006. Special advocacy: political expediency and legal roles in modern judicial systems. Legal Ethics. 9 (1), pp. 101-124.
Human rights law debate
Nash, S. 2006. Human rights law debate. New Law Journal. 156 (7229), pp. 984-985.
Torture: a legitimate interrogation technique or a gross violation of human rights
Nash, S. 2005. Torture: a legitimate interrogation technique or a gross violation of human rights. in: Gehl, G. (ed.) Folter - zulassiges Instrument im Strafrecht?: ein internationaler Vergleich Bertuch. pp. 125-132
Recent developments in English criminal law and procedure
Nash, S. 2005. Recent developments in English criminal law and procedure. Criminal Law Journal. 29 (4), pp. 228-236.
The cartel offence
Furse, M. and Nash, S. 2004. The cartel offence. Oxford, UK Hart.
Partners in crime: the UK cartel offence
Furse, M. and Nash, S. 2004. Partners in crime: the UK cartel offence. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 15 (5), pp. 138-153.
Evidence law in England and Wales: the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998
Choo, A.L.T. and Nash, S. 2003. Evidence law in England and Wales: the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998. International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 7 (1), pp. 31-61.
Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/92xqx/case-note-drawing-inferences-from-positive-suggestions-put-to-witnesses-r-v-webber