Making Digital Surveillance Unacceptable? Security, Democracy, and the Political Sociology of Disputes

McCluskey, E. and Aradau, C. 2021. Making Digital Surveillance Unacceptable? Security, Democracy, and the Political Sociology of Disputes. International Political Sociology. 16 (1) olab024. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab024

TitleMaking Digital Surveillance Unacceptable? Security, Democracy, and the Political Sociology of Disputes
TypeJournal article
AuthorsMcCluskey, E. and Aradau, C.
Abstract

Despite extensive criticisms of mass surveillance and mobilization by civil liberties and digital rights activists, surveillance has paradoxically been extended and legalized in the name of security. How do some democratic claims against surveillance appear to be normal and common-sense, whereas others are deemed unacceptable, even outlandish? Instead of
starting from particular “logics” of either security or democracy, this paper proposes to develop a political sociology of disputes to trace how the relation between security and democracy is shaped by critique in practice. Disputes entail critique and demands for justification. They allow us to account for the constraints which govern whether an argument is deemed acceptable or improper; commonsensical or peculiar. We mobilize disputes in conjunction with Arjun Appadurai’s reflections on “small numbers” in democracies in order to understand how justifications of surveillance for security enact a “rise in generality,” whereas critiques of digital surveillance that mobilize democratic claims enact a “descent into singularity.” To this purpose, we analyze public mobilizations against mass surveillance and challenges brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). We draw on interviews with a range of actors involved in the disputes, the parties’ submissions, oral hearings, judgments, and public reports.

KeywordsSurveillance
Security
Democracy
Dispute
Boltanski
Article numberolab024
JournalInternational Political Sociology
Journal citation16 (1)
Year2021
PublisherOxford Academic
Publisher's version
License
CC BY 4.0
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab024
Web address (URL)https://academic.oup.com/ips/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ips/olab024/6408727
Publication dates
Published online22 Oct 2021
Published in printMar 2022
FunderESRC (Economic & Social Research Council)

Related outputs

From abuse to trust and back again
McCluskey, E. and Aradau, C. 2024. From abuse to trust and back again. in: Bigo, D., McCluskey, E. and Treguer, F. (ed.) Intelligence oversight in times of transnational impunity: Who will watch the watchers? London Routledge.

Towards democratic intelligence oversight: Limits, practices, struggles
Kniep, R., Aradau, C., Treguer, F., Ewert, L., McCluskey, E. and Leon-Reyes, B. 2024. Towards democratic intelligence oversight: Limits, practices, struggles. Review of International Studies. 50 (1), pp. 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210523000013

Bourdieu the Ethnographer: Grounding the Habitus of the ‘Far-Right’ Voter
McCluskey, E. 2024. Bourdieu the Ethnographer: Grounding the Habitus of the ‘Far-Right’ Voter. Cooperation and Conflict. 59 (1), pp. 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367231154165

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/vq221/making-digital-surveillance-unacceptable-security-democracy-and-the-political-sociology-of-disputes


Share this

Usage statistics

177 total views
156 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.