Until Marriage Do Us Part: Women Teachers and the Marriage Bar in the 1920's

Not for Want of Trying series episode 9: Sacked for Being Married - How Teachers Fought Back
Samuels, H. 2024. Not for Want of Trying series episode 9: Sacked for Being Married - How Teachers Fought Back. Apple podcasts

Short v Poole Corporation (1926)
Samuels, H. 2024. Short v Poole Corporation (1926). in: Auchmuty, R., Rackley, E. and Takayanagi, M. (ed.) Women's Legal Landmarks in the InterWar Years: Not for Want of Trying Oxford Hart Publishing. pp. 165-172

Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 5th edition
Webley, L. and Samuels, H. 2021. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 5th edition. Oxford University Press (OUP).

A National Treasure? The Role of Civil Society in Promoting and Enforcing Human Rights in the United Kingdom
Samuels, H. 2020. A National Treasure? The Role of Civil Society in Promoting and Enforcing Human Rights in the United Kingdom. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 12 (3), p. 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa046

The Archers, the Radio, Violence against Women and Changing the World at Teatime
Samuels, H. 2020. The Archers, the Radio, Violence against Women and Changing the World at Teatime. feminists@law. 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/03/feminists@law.852

International Women’s Day 2019: In Conversation with Harriet Wistrich
Harriet Samuels 2019. International Women’s Day 2019: In Conversation with Harriet Wistrich. Feminist Legal Studies. 27, pp. 311-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-019-09411-4

Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edition
Webley, L. and Samuels, H. 2018. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edition. Oxford University Press (OUP).

Public Law
Samuels, H. 2018. Public Law. in: Auchmuty, R. (ed.) Great Debates in Gender and Law London Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 25-35

Education Act 1944
Samuels, H. 2018. Education Act 1944. in: Rackley, E. and Auchmuty, R.S. (ed.) Women's Legal Landmarks: Celebrating the history of women and law in the UK and Ireland London Hart Publishing. pp. 219-226

Public Interest Litigation and the Civil Society Factor
Samuels, H. 2018. Public Interest Litigation and the Civil Society Factor. Legal Studies. 38 (4), pp. 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2018.9

Women Asylum Seekers in the Current Crisis: A Conversation
Samuels, H. 2017. Women Asylum Seekers in the Current Crisis: A Conversation. Feminist Legal Studies. 25 (1), pp. 99-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9346-z

Feminist engagement with law in the new millennium
Samuels, H. 2014. Feminist engagement with law in the new millennium. PhD thesis University of Westminster Westminster Law School https://doi.org/10.34737/8yv73

Judicial deference and feminist method
Samuels, H. 2014. Judicial deference and feminist method. Public Law. July 2014, pp. 512-528.

Feminizing human rights adjudication: feminist method and the proportionality principle
Samuels, H. 2013. Feminizing human rights adjudication: feminist method and the proportionality principle. Feminist Legal Studies. 21 (1), pp. 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9225-6

Feminist legal theory
Samuels, H. 2013. Feminist legal theory. in: Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (ed.) Law and social theory, 2nd ed. Oxford Hart. pp. 129-146

Complete Public Law: Text, Cases and Materials (2nd Edition)
Webley, L. and Samuels, H. 2012. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases and Materials (2nd Edition). Oxford, UK Oxford University Press.

Women, culture and human rights: feminist interventions in human rights law?
Samuels, H. 2010. Women, culture and human rights: feminist interventions in human rights law? in: Banakar, R. (ed.) Rights in context: law and justice in late modern society Ashgate. pp. 317-332

Commentary on Roberts v Hopwood
Samuels, H. 2010. Commentary on Roberts v Hopwood. in: Hunter, R.C., McGlynn, C. and Rackley, E. (ed.) Feminist judgments: from theory to practice Hart.

An uneasy alliance? The relationship between feminist legal studies and gender, sexuality and law
Samuels, H. 2009. An uneasy alliance? The relationship between feminist legal studies and gender, sexuality and law. Feminist Legal Studies. 17 (3), pp. 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-009-9135-4

Complete Public Law: Test Cases and Materials
Webley, L. and Samuels, H. 2009. Complete Public Law: Test Cases and Materials. Oxford, UK Oxford University Press.

A human rights campaign? The campaign to abolish child slavery in Hong Kong 1919-1938
Samuels, H. 2007. A human rights campaign? The campaign to abolish child slavery in Hong Kong 1919-1938. Journal of Human Rights. 6 (3), pp. 361-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754830701560764

Feminist activism, third party interventions and the courts
Samuels, H. 2005. Feminist activism, third party interventions and the courts. Feminist Legal Studies. 13 (1), pp. 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-005-1454-5

A defining moment: a feminist perspective on the law of sexual harassment in the workplace in the light of the Equal Treatment Amendment Directive
Samuels, H. 2004. A defining moment: a feminist perspective on the law of sexual harassment in the workplace in the light of the Equal Treatment Amendment Directive. Feminist Legal Studies. 12 (2), pp. 181-211. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000043307.48041.64

Sexual harassment in the workplace: a feminist analysis of recent developments in the UK
Samuels, H. 2003. Sexual harassment in the workplace: a feminist analysis of recent developments in the UK. Women's Studies International Forum. 26 (5-6), pp. 467-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2003.08.004

The international convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women: a comparison of its implementation and the role of non-governmental organisations in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong
Samuels, H. and Petersen, C. 2002. The international convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women: a comparison of its implementation and the role of non-governmental organisations in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review. 26, pp. 1-50.