Abstract | Abstract Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand how those involved in executive pay determination in large publicly quoted UK businesses see the role of diversity within remuneration committees (Remcos) as enabling the input of different perspectives which can enhance their decision-making and potentially improve pay outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 18 high profile major-enterprise decision-makers and their advisers i.e., non-executive directors (NEDs) serving on Remcos, institutional investors, executive pay consultants and internal human resources (HR) reward specialists, together with data from three focus groups with 10 further reward management practitioners. Findings Remco members recognise the benefits of social category/demographic diversity but say the likelihood of increasing this is low, given talent pipeline issues. The widening of value diversity is considered problematic for Remco functioning. Informational diversity is used as a proxy for social category/demographic diversity to improve Remco decision-making on executive pay. While the inclusion of members from wider social networks is recognised as potentially bringing a different informational perspective, the social character of Remcos, reflecting their elite nature and experience of wealth, appears ingrained. Originality/value Our original contribution is to extend the application of upper echelons theory in the context of Remco decision-making to explain why members do not welcome widening informational diversity by appointing people from different social networks who lack value similarity. Instead, by drawing views from employees, HR acts as a proxy for social network informational diversity. The elite upper echelons nature of Remco appointments remains unchanged and team functioning is not disrupted. |
---|