Abstract | In “feral landscape” practices, humans co-create landscapes with the ecosystems and species. These landscapes are neither wild nor fully designed. This is a diverse spectrum with varying degrees of control and scale, including “rewilding” and ecological forms of landscape architecture. In such practices, ecosystems and species are self-willed; they are given a voice. An analysis of the categories of human tools and techniques used in these feral practices and how they are applied reveals a particular ecological polity. The physical tools, used sparingly as the landscapes evolve, negotiate the tensions and conflicts between multiple other-than-human and human communities, adjusting the ecological balance, meaning, and livelihood. The polity is primarily a bottom-up process, led mainly by other-than-humans. Surprisingly, feral approaches that give the most agency to all living beings and systems are primarily guided by limited but mostly violent acts, analogous to libertarian approaches. Yet feral landscape practices are far from a laissez-faire survival of the fittest attitude; there is benevolence in the care applied in this form of ontopolitical libertarianism, in which humans’ primary ecopolitical role is to expand and balance an ontologically heterogeneous body politics, and weave humans with their other-than-human demos. |
---|