| Abstract | This article reclaims open space as a critical category for landscape architecture, challenging its reduction to a void to be programmed amid socioecological crisis. It theorises open space as a contested dynamic assemblage where ecological processes, colonial histories and more-than-human agencies intersect with design’s technocratic impulses. Drawing on relational spatiality, we argue for a pluriversal theoretical framework that is attentive to overlaps, tensions, and entanglements, interrogating how this construct supports design agency amid complexity and inequality. Using the Puente Hills Landfill as a case study and boundary object, we examine how openness manifests across temporal, material and social registers, predicating open space as a generative, open-ended system and performative terrain where ecological subjectivities, cultural inscriptions, and socio-political claims converge, demanding a radical reorientation of design agency and landscape architecture’s epistemic boundaries. |
|---|