Moral Values & Trust in Science

Joyner, L. 2026. Moral Values & Trust in Science. Current Opinion in Psychology. 67 102212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102212

TitleMoral Values & Trust in Science
TypeJournal article
AuthorsJoyner, L.
Abstract

Mistrust in science can arise from the belief that science or scientists act in ways that undermines our wellbeing or go against our best interests (Jaiswal & Halktis, 2019). Such actions may also constitute a perceived moral violation. Considering how science and scientists are perceived to uphold or undermine moral norms and values may therefore provide helpful insights for understanding relationships of trust. In this review of the trust literature, I explore some of the ways that individuals or communities may perceive different categories of moral values (i.e., Harm, Purity / Sanctity, Authority, Loyalty, and Fairness) as being upheld or undermined by science or scientists. Firstly, examples of harm are discussed (e.g., physical and spiritual harms), followed by research on trust in science and individual differences (i.e., disgust sensitivity, religiosity, and worldviews and ideologies). Research around social identity, and fairness are also examined. Identifying where and why perceived moral violations may arise could be helpful for furthering our understanding relationships of mistrust in science and developing tailored interventions to build and sustain trust. It also provides an opportunity for scientists and researchers to reflect on the moral values that they and any communities they seek to work with hold to ensure any procedures and practices do not inadvertently undermine the trust relationship.

Article number102212
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Journal citation67
ISSN2352-2518
2352-250X
Year2026
PublisherElsevier
Publisher's version
License
CC BY 4.0
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102212
Publication dates
Published online14 Nov 2025
Published in printFeb 2026

Related outputs

The Use of Smart Surveillance Technologies for Suicide Prevention in Public Spaces: A Professional Stakeholder Survey from the United Kingdom
Joyner, L., Cliffe, B., Mackenzie, J.-M., Pettersen, E., Philips, P., Marsh, I. and Marzano, L. Forthcoming. The Use of Smart Surveillance Technologies for Suicide Prevention in Public Spaces: A Professional Stakeholder Survey from the United Kingdom. BMC Public Health.

Environmental Risk Factors for Railway Suicide: A Nationwide Analysis of England’s Mainline Network (2019–2021)
Lisa Marzano, Sophie Brown, Ruth Spence, Laura Joyner, Hilary Norman, Bob Fields, Arianna Barbin, Ian Kruger and Steven MacDonald Hart 2025. Environmental Risk Factors for Railway Suicide: A Nationwide Analysis of England’s Mainline Network (2019–2021). Archives of Suicide Research. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2025.2595428

The effectiveness of surveillance technology for the prevention of suicides in public spaces: a systematic review
Laura Joyner, Bethany Cliffe, Jay-Marie Mackenzie, Keith Hawton, Peter Craig and Lisa Marzano 2025. The effectiveness of surveillance technology for the prevention of suicides in public spaces: a systematic review. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.17.25338217

Suicide Prevention Measures at High-Risk Locations: A Goal-Directed Motivation Perspective
Laura Joyner, Jay-Marie Mackenzie, Andy Willis, Penny Phillips, Bethany Cliffe, Ian Marsh, Elizabeth Pettersen, Keith Hawton and Lisa Marzano 2025. Suicide Prevention Measures at High-Risk Locations: A Goal-Directed Motivation Perspective. Behavioral Sciences. 15 (8) 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081009

Evaluating 'Suicide Surveillance Technologies' at high-risk locations
Cliffe, B., Joyner, L., Marzano, L., Mackenzie, J.-M. and Marsh, I. 2024. Evaluating 'Suicide Surveillance Technologies' at high-risk locations. The Psychologist.

Preprint: The Use of Smart Surveillance Technologies for Suicide Prevention in Public Spaces: A Professional Stakeholder Survey from the United Kingdom
Laura Joyner, Bethany Cliffe, Jay-Marie Mackenzie, Elizabeth Pettersen, Ian Marsh, Penny Phillips and Lisa Marzano 2024. Preprint: The Use of Smart Surveillance Technologies for Suicide Prevention in Public Spaces: A Professional Stakeholder Survey from the United Kingdom. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5137455/v1

Individual differences in sharing false political information on social media: deliberate and accidental sharing, motivations and positive schizotypy
Buchanan, T., Perach, R., Husbands, D., Tout, A., Kostyuk, E., Kempley, J. and Joyner, L. 2024. Individual differences in sharing false political information on social media: deliberate and accidental sharing, motivations and positive schizotypy. PLoS ONE. 19 (6) e0304855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304855

Why Do People Share Political Information and Misinformation Online? Developing a Bottom-Up Descriptive Framework
Perach, R., Joyner, L., Husbands, D. and Buchanan, T. 2023. Why Do People Share Political Information and Misinformation Online? Developing a Bottom-Up Descriptive Framework. Social Media + Society. 9 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231192032

The Online Behaviour Taxonomy: A conceptual framework to understand behaviour in computer-mediated communication
Kaye, L.K., Rousaki, A., Joyner, L.C., Barrett, L.A.F. and Orchard, L.J. 2022. The Online Behaviour Taxonomy: A conceptual framework to understand behaviour in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior. 137 107443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107443

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/x4511/moral-values-trust-in-science


Share this

Usage statistics

64 total views
24 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.