Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)

Karen Elliott, Rob Price, Patricia Shaw, Tasos Spiliotopoulos, Magdalene Ng, Kovila Coopamootoo and Aad van Moorsel 2021. Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR). Society. 58, pp. 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8

TitleTowards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)
TypeJournal article
AuthorsKaren Elliott, Rob Price, Patricia Shaw, Tasos Spiliotopoulos, Magdalene Ng, Kovila Coopamootoo and Aad van Moorsel
Abstract

In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus termed the “black box”. Central to understanding the “black box” is to acknowledge that the algorithm is not mendaciously undertaking this action; it is simply using the recombination afforded to scaled computable machine learning algorithms. But an algorithm with arbitrary precision can easily reconstruct those characteristics and make life-changing decisions, particularly in financial services (credit scoring, risk assessment, etc.), and it could be difficult to reconstruct, if this was done in a fair manner reflecting the values of society. If we permit AI to make life-changing decisions, what are the opportunity costs, data trade-offs, and implications for social, economic, technical, legal, and environmental systems? We find that over 160 ethical AI principles exist, advocating organisations to act responsibly to avoid causing digital societal harms. This maelstrom of guidance, none of which is compulsory, serves to confuse, as opposed to guide. We need to think carefully about how we implement these algorithms, the delegation of decisions and data usage, in the absence of human oversight and AI governance. The paper seeks to harmonise and align approaches, illustrating the opportunities and threats of AI, while raising awareness of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) as a potential collaborative mechanism to demystify governance complexity and to establish an equitable digital society.

JournalSociety
Journal citation58, pp. 179-188
Year2021
PublisherSpringer Nature
Publisher's version
License
CC BY 4.0
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8
Web address (URL)https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8
Publication dates
Published14 Jun 2021

Related outputs

An ‘Enlightenment Phase’: Police Perspectives on the Contemporary Challenges of Digital Evidence and Digital Forensic Investigations
Magdalene Ng, Rachael Medhurst and Coral J. Dando 2026. An ‘Enlightenment Phase’: Police Perspectives on the Contemporary Challenges of Digital Evidence and Digital Forensic Investigations. Information. 17 (6) 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17060538

“A Ronin Without a Master”: Exploring Police Perspectives on Digital Evidence in England and Wales
Ng, M., Medhurst, R, Dando, C.J. and Bull, R. 2025. “A Ronin Without a Master”: Exploring Police Perspectives on Digital Evidence in England and Wales. Behavioral Sciences. 15 (10) 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101416

How Memory and Storytelling May Work to Reduce Prejudice​
Minson, K., Ng, M., Yetkili, O. and Loveday, C. 2025. How Memory and Storytelling May Work to Reduce Prejudice​. Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (SARMAC XV 2025). Kildare, Ireland 11 - 14 Jun 2025

Opportunities for digital banking: Lived experiences of financially vulnerable customers in the UK
Elliott, Karen, Copilah-Ali, Jehana and Ng, Magdalene 2025. Opportunities for digital banking: Lived experiences of financially vulnerable customers in the UK. Journal of Digital Banking. 9 (4) 340. https://doi.org/10.69554/mfhh5524

“What you say in the lab, stays in the lab”: A reflexive thematic analysis of current challenges and future directions of digital forensic investigations in the UK
Ng, M., James, J. and Bull, R. 2024. “What you say in the lab, stays in the lab”: A reflexive thematic analysis of current challenges and future directions of digital forensic investigations in the UK. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation. 51 301839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301839

What We Do in the Shadows: How does Experiencing Cybercrime Affect Response Actions; Protective Practices?
Ng, Magdalene, Bada, Maria and Coopamootoo, Kovila P.L. 2023. What We Do in the Shadows: How does Experiencing Cybercrime Affect Response Actions; Protective Practices? 2023 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW). https://doi.org/10.1109/eurospw59978.2023.00077

Cybercrimes in the aftermath of COVID-19: Present concerns and future directions
Ng, M., Widanaralalage, B. K., Buchanan, T. and Coopamootoo, K. 2022. Cybercrimes in the aftermath of COVID-19: Present concerns and future directions. Journal of Concurrent Disorders. https://doi.org/10.54127/LWVW7835

Exploring the use of rapport in professional information‐gathering contexts by systematically mapping the evidence base
Fiona Gabbert, Lorraine Hope, Kirk Luther, Gordon Wright, Magdalene Ng and Gavin Oxburgh 2021. Exploring the use of rapport in professional information‐gathering contexts by systematically mapping the evidence base. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 35 (2), pp. 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3762

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/x6747/towards-an-equitable-digital-society-artificial-intelligence-ai-and-corporate-digital-responsibility-cdr


Share this

Usage statistics

0 total views
0 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.