Understanding the Middle East peace process: a historical institutionalist approach

Dannreuther, R. 2011. Understanding the Middle East peace process: a historical institutionalist approach. European Journal of International Relations. 17 (2), pp. 187-208.

TitleUnderstanding the Middle East peace process: a historical institutionalist approach
AuthorsDannreuther, R.
Abstract

This article challenges the common assumption that the external actors involved in the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) are driven either by neo-realist strategic competition or by the constraining power of domestic lobbies, or by a mixture of both. Such implicit assumptions are evident in the controversial argument of the power of the ‘Israel lobby’ as promoted by Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer. This article argues that approaches based on such assumptions fail to explain adequately the policies adopted not only by the United States, but also by other key external actors who have been historically engaged in the MEPP — the Soviet Union and the European Union. A better explanatory framework is provided by treating the MEPP as an institution and by applying a historical institutionalist approach to the development of the MEPP, using such concepts as critical junctures, path dependence and positive feedback to analyse how the main external actors involved in the MEPP came to adopt their distinctive national approaches to the peace process. In particular, it is the responses of these actors to certain critical junctures, most notably but not exclusively to the period of the 1967 and 1973 Arab–Israeli wars, that has had a particularly strong influence on policy formulation. For the US case, the creative policymaking of Henry Kissinger during the period after the 1973 war, which was subsequently incorporated into the US conceptualization of the MEPP, provides powerful and generally unrecognized insights into the initial puzzle identified by Walt and Mearsheimer — the consistent and almost unconditional support given to Israel by the United States despite the strategic problems this creates for broader US Middle East policy.

JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
Journal citation17 (2), pp. 187-208
ISSN1354-0661
YearJun 2011
PublisherSage
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1177/1354066110366045
Publication dates
PublishedJun 2011

Related outputs

Understanding Russia's return to the Middle East
Dannreuther, R. 2018. Understanding Russia's return to the Middle East. International Politics.

Energy security in Central and Eastern Europe: An IR theoretical framework
Dannreuther, R. 2018. Energy security in Central and Eastern Europe: An IR theoretical framework. in: Ostrowski , W. and Butler, E. (ed.) Understanding Energy Security in Central and Eastern Europe Abingdon Routledge. pp. 17-31

Energy Security
Dannreuther, R. 2017. Energy Security. Cambridge Polity Press.

EU-Russia Energy Relations in Context
Dannreuther, R. 2016. EU-Russia Energy Relations in Context. Geopolitics. 21 (4), pp. 913-921.

Energy security and shifting modes of governance
Dannreuther, R. 2015. Energy security and shifting modes of governance. International Politics. 52 (4), pp. 466-483.

Russia and the Arab Spring: supporting the counter-revolution
Dannreuther, R. 2015. Russia and the Arab Spring: supporting the counter-revolution. Journal of European Integration. 37 (1), pp. 77-94.

Shifting dynamics of the insurgency and counter-insurgency in the North Caucasus
Dannreuther, R. 2014. Shifting dynamics of the insurgency and counter-insurgency in the North Caucasus. Ethnopolitics. 13 (4), pp. 377-395.

International security: the contemporary agenda (2nd edition)
Dannreuther, R. 2013. International security: the contemporary agenda (2nd edition). Cambridge Polity.

Geopolitics and international relations of resources
Dannreuther, R. 2013. Geopolitics and international relations of resources. in: Dannreuther, R. and Ostrowksi, W. (ed.) Global resources: conflict and cooperation Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 79-97

Russia and the Middle East: a Cold War paradigm?
Dannreuther, R. 2012. Russia and the Middle East: a Cold War paradigm? Europe-Asia Studies. 64 (3), pp. 543-560.

China and global oil: vulnerability and opportunity
Dannreuther, R. 2011. China and global oil: vulnerability and opportunity. International Affairs. 87 (6), pp. 1345-1364.

China, oil and global politics
Andrews-Speed, P. and Dannreuther, R. 2011. China, oil and global politics. London Routledge.

Russian discourses and approaches to Islam and Islamism
Dannreuther, R. 2010. Russian discourses and approaches to Islam and Islamism. in: Dannreuther, R. and March, L. (ed.) Russia and Islam: state, society and radicalism London Routledge.

Energy security
Dannreuther, R. 2010. Energy security. in: Burgess, J.P. (ed.) Handbook of new security studies Abingdon Routledge. pp. 144-153

Islamic radicalization in Russia: an assessment
Dannreuther, R. 2010. Islamic radicalization in Russia: an assessment. International Affairs. 86 (1), pp. 109-126.

Europe and the Middle East: attempting to bridge the divide
Dannreuther, R. 2009. Europe and the Middle East: attempting to bridge the divide. in: Tardy, T. (ed.) European security in a global context: internal and external dynamics London Routledge. pp. 135-153

Chechnya: has Moscow won?
Dannreuther, R. and March, L. 2008. Chechnya: has Moscow won? Survival. 50 (4), pp. 97-112.

European neighbourhood policy - Selling the brand strategically
Dannreuther, R. 2008. European neighbourhood policy - Selling the brand strategically. Studia Diplomatica. 61 (3), pp. 47-58.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/8zv65/understanding-the-middle-east-peace-process-a-historical-institutionalist-approach


Share this
Tweet
Email