Lab and framed lab versus natural experiments: evidence from a risky choice experiment

Botti, F., Conte, A., Di Cagno, D.T. and D’Ippoliti, C. 2009. Lab and framed lab versus natural experiments: evidence from a risky choice experiment. Research in economics. 63 (4), pp. 282-295.

TitleLab and framed lab versus natural experiments: evidence from a risky choice experiment
AuthorsBotti, F., Conte, A., Di Cagno, D.T. and D’Ippoliti, C.
Abstract

Some recent papers have studied data from TV game shows to examine the behaviour of individuals towards risk. It is generally agreed that data from these shows are useful in detecting individual risk aversion in the field, with both “real life” subjects and incentives. Field experiments also include some interesting reality features that could affect individuals’ behaviour and possibly lead to different findings. This paper aims at investigating lab versus field evidence in risk taking attitudes, especially controlling for framing effects. To assess whether the behaviour of subjects in the field is consistent with that of experimental subjects, we designed an experiment to mimic (with experimental rewards and subjects) the rules of a well-known Italian TV game show, Affari Tuoi, in two different settings: a traditional lab setting, where the game was played individually (109 subjects) (Treatment 1); and a framed lab, in which the experiment was replicated in the Italian public television (RAI) studio where the show was actually recorded, with a smaller sample of undergraduate students (33) and in the presence of an audience (Treatment 2). Our comparison between the two different settings aims at establishing whether the presence of an audience, or of a situation that reproduces the stress that contestants must experience in the TV studio, can affect experimental subjects’ choices. We did not find any significant evidence of framing effects: students behave in a similar way in the two lab settings, responding essentially to incentives. Comparing the risk attitudes shown by experimental subjects in the two lab treatments with those exhibited by the contestants in the field, we found that contestants in the TV show are generally more risk averse than students in the lab.

JournalResearch in economics
Journal citation63 (4), pp. 282-295
ISSN1090-9443
YearDec 2009
PublisherElsevier
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1016/j.rie.2009.09.001
Publication dates
PublishedDec 2009

Related outputs

Risk Preferences and the Role of Emotions
Conte, A., Levati, M.V. and Nardi, C. 2018. Risk Preferences and the Role of Emotions. Economica. 85 (338), pp. 305-328.

The impact of time limitation: insights from a queueing experiment
Conte, A., Scarsini, M. and Sürücü, O. 2016. The impact of time limitation: insights from a queueing experiment. Judgment and Decision Making. 11 (3), pp. 260-274.

Behavioural Patterns in Social Networks
Conte, A., Di Cagno, D.T. and Sciubba, E. 2015. Behavioural Patterns in Social Networks. Economic Inquiry. 53 (2), pp. 1331-1349.

The econometric modelling of social preferences
Conte, A. and Moffatt, P.G. 2014. The econometric modelling of social preferences. Theory and decision. 76 (1), pp. 119-145.

The impact of truancy on educational attainment during compulsory schooling: a bivariate ordered probit estimator with mixed effects
Buscha, F. and Conte, A. 2014. The impact of truancy on educational attainment during compulsory schooling: a bivariate ordered probit estimator with mixed effects. The Manchester School. 82 (1), pp. 103-127.

Assessing multiple prior models of behaviour under ambiguity
Conte, A. and Hey, J.D. 2013. Assessing multiple prior models of behaviour under ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 46 (2), pp. 113-132.

Are you experienced? SME use of and attitudes towards workplace mediation
Latreille, P., Buscha, F. and Conte, A. 2012. Are you experienced? SME use of and attitudes towards workplace mediation. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 23 (3), pp. 590-606.

A test of the rational expectations hypothesis using data from a natural experiment
Conte, A., Moffatt, P.G., Botti, F., Di Cagno, D.T. and D’Ippoliti, C. 2012. A test of the rational expectations hypothesis using data from a natural experiment. Applied Economics. 44 (35), pp. 4661-4678.

Assessing multiple prior models of behaviour under ambiguity
Conte, A. and Hey, J.D. 2012. Assessing multiple prior models of behaviour under ambiguity. York University of York.

Mixture models of choice under risk
Conte, A., Hey, J.D. and Moffatt, P.G. 2011. Mixture models of choice under risk. Journal of Econometrics. 162 (1), pp. 79-88.

SME attitudes towards mediation: some survey evidence
Latreille, P., Buscha, F. and Conte, A. 2010. SME attitudes towards mediation: some survey evidence. Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS).

Risk attitude in real decision problems
Botti, F., Conte, A., Di Cagno, D.T. and D’Ippoliti, C. 2008. Risk attitude in real decision problems. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. 8 (1).

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/908w1/lab-and-framed-lab-versus-natural-experiments-evidence-from-a-risky-choice-experiment


Share this
Tweet
Email