Discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation outside the workplace: is it actionable?

Connolly, M. 2005. Discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation outside the workplace: is it actionable? Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. 2.

TitleDiscrimination on grounds of sexual orientation outside the workplace: is it actionable?
AuthorsConnolly, M.
Abstract

In 1998 the European Court of Justice - in Grant v. South West Trains Ltd (Case C-249/96) [1998] I.C.R. 449) - held that the existing EU sex discrimination legislation did not extend to discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. Domestic courts have taken the same line with the Sex Discrimination Act 1975. However, since 1st December 2003, discrimination of grounds of sexual orientation has been unlawful in the workplace, under the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations ('the Regulations') 2003 (S.I. 2003/1661, implemented in response to the Framework Directive, 2000/78/EC). Unfortunately, these new Regulations, covering employment matters only, do not correspond fully with the UK's existing legislative schemes provided by the Sex Discrimination Act, or the Race Relations Act 1976. This is because they do not extend to activities such as the provision of goods, facilities and services; housing, and education. However, in these activities, there are some cases of sexual orientation discrimination that may be argued under the Sex Discrimination Act, the Human Rights Act 1998, or the common law. These possibilities will be explored, sometimes with the help of the Canadian and United States' experiences.

JournalWeb Journal of Current Legal Issues
Journal citation2
ISSN1360-1326
YearApr 2005
FileConnolly_2005_final.pdf
Web address (URL)http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2005/issue2/connolly2.html
Publication dates
PublishedApr 2005

Related outputs

Age discrimination, the default retirement age and occupational pensions: experiences from Canada and predictions for Britain
Connolly, M. and Gough, O. 2007. Age discrimination, the default retirement age and occupational pensions: experiences from Canada and predictions for Britain. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. 1 Web.

Discriminatory motive and the but for test: the proper approach to direct discrimination in Britain and the United States
Connolly, M. 2007. Discriminatory motive and the but for test: the proper approach to direct discrimination in Britain and the United States. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 9 (1), p. 37.

The future of disparate impact in Britain and the United States: shoot the Wards Cove quota myth and recognize plantation economy cases
Connolly, M. 2006. The future of disparate impact in Britain and the United States: shoot the Wards Cove quota myth and recognize plantation economy cases. International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations. 4.

Problems with equality: is equality the proper basis for discrimination law?
Connolly, M. 2005. Problems with equality: is equality the proper basis for discrimination law? Association of Law Teachers 40th Annual Conference: enhancing the student experience. Edinburgh, UK 20-22 Mar 2005

From slavery to ageism: finding a common ground for anti-discrimination law
Connolly, M. 2005. From slavery to ageism: finding a common ground for anti-discrimination law. Academy of legal Studies in Business, 80th Annual Conference. San Francisco, California 03-06 Aug 2006

Discrimination law and the quota fear in Britain and the United States
Connolly, M. 2005. Discrimination law and the quota fear in Britain and the United States. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 6, pp. 325-338.

The definition of indirect race discrimination and subjective employment practices
Connolly, M. 2003. The definition of indirect race discrimination and subjective employment practices. Green's Employment Law Bulletin. 54.

Discrimination law: justification, alternative measures and defences based on sex
Connolly, M. 2002. Discrimination law: justification, alternative measures and defences based on sex. Industrial Law Journal. 30 (3), pp. 311-318.

Discrimination law: victimisation
Connolly, M. 2002. Discrimination law: victimisation. Industrial Law Journal. 31 (2), pp. 161-170.

Subjective hiring practices; quotas and plantation economies: what is the new definition of indirect discrimination supposed to challenge?
Connolly, M. 2002. Subjective hiring practices; quotas and plantation economies: what is the new definition of indirect discrimination supposed to challenge? Journal of Civil Liberties. 7 (3), pp. 129-137.

The Sex Discrimination (Indirect Discrimination and Burden of Proof) Regulations 2001 (SI 2001 No 2260)
Connolly, M. 2001. The Sex Discrimination (Indirect Discrimination and Burden of Proof) Regulations 2001 (SI 2001 No 2260). Industrial Law Journal. 30 (4), pp. 375-382.

The burden of proof regulations
Connolly, M. 2001. The burden of proof regulations. Green's Employment Law Bulletin. 44.

Race, gender and mens rea
Connolly, M. 2001. Race, gender and mens rea. Journal of Civil Liberties. 6 (2), pp. 151-160.

One careful owner?
Connolly, M. 2001. One careful owner? Solicitors Journal. 145 (47).

More new law on victimisation
Connolly, M. 2001. More new law on victimisation. Green's Employment Law Bulletin. 46.

Allonby v. Accrington and Rossendale College: note and comment
Connolly, M. 2001. Allonby v. Accrington and Rossendale College: note and comment. Green's Employment Law Bulletin. 43.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/929x4/discrimination-on-grounds-of-sexual-orientation-outside-the-workplace-is-it-actionable


Share this
Tweet
Email