Streamlining or watering down? Assessing the 'smartness' of policy and standards for the promotion of low and zero carbon homes in England 2010-15

Greenwood, D., Congreve, A. and King, M. 2017. Streamlining or watering down? Assessing the 'smartness' of policy and standards for the promotion of low and zero carbon homes in England 2010-15. Energy Policy. 110, pp. 490-499. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.033

TitleStreamlining or watering down? Assessing the 'smartness' of policy and standards for the promotion of low and zero carbon homes in England 2010-15
AuthorsGreenwood, D., Congreve, A. and King, M.
Abstract

The knowledge and enforcement problems faced by governments in defining traditional ‘command and control’ regulation are well known. Significant legal scholarship offers alternative models of ‘smart,’ ‘responsive’ environmental regulation, emphasising the need for policy instrument mixes, including the vital role of voluntary, industry-led sustainability standards. Yet, as is being increasingly recognised, these contributions leave open the need for detailed, qualitative evaluation of instrument mixes as a complement to primarily quantitative cost-benefit analyses that predominate in regulatory impact assessments by governments. Addressing this need, this paper evaluates policy and standards for low and zero carbon homes in England during the Coalition government (2010-2015) when the ecological modernisation discourse of the previous New Labour government became subsumed by a deregulation agenda. Our study, incorporating 70 stakeholder interviews, suggests that, in supplier-driven markets such as housing in England, a ‘smart’ mix of mandatory and voluntary standards requires a strong, central role for government in setting national, mandatory standards and supporting their delivery. There is an important potential supplementary role for voluntary tools and local authority discretion, though our study highlights problems that can arise when such different instruments promote diverging roadmaps towards a policy goal.

Keywordssmart regulation; zero carbon homes; deregulation
JournalEnergy Policy
Journal citation110, pp. 490-499
ISSN0301-4215
Year2017
PublisherElsevier
Accepted author manuscriptGreenwood Congreve and King 20170705 final submitted .pdf
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.033
Publication dates
Published online04 Sep 2017
Published04 Sep 2017
LicenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Related outputs

Evaluating coordination and learning within governance: open epistemological issues
Greenwood, D. 2018. Evaluating coordination and learning within governance: open epistemological issues. in: Dotti, N.F. (ed.) Knowledge, Policymaking and Learning for European Cities and Regions: From Research to Practice Cheltenham Edward Elgar. pp. 219-230

Governance, Coordination and Evaluation: the case for an epistemological focus and a return to C.E. Lindblom
Greenwood, D. 2016. Governance, Coordination and Evaluation: the case for an epistemological focus and a return to C.E. Lindblom. Political Research Quarterly. 69 (1), pp. 30-42. doi:10.1177/1065912915620048

In search of green political economy: steering markets, innovation and the case of the zero carbon homes agenda in England
Greenwood, D. 2015. In search of green political economy: steering markets, innovation and the case of the zero carbon homes agenda in England. Environmental Politics. 24 (3), pp. 423-441. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1008227

The challenge of policy coordination for sustainable sociotechnical transitions: the case of the zero-carbon homes agenda in England
Greenwood, D. 2012. The challenge of policy coordination for sustainable sociotechnical transitions: the case of the zero-carbon homes agenda in England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 30 (1), pp. 162-179. doi:10.1068/c1146

The problem of coordination in politics: what critics of neoliberalism might draw from its advocates
Greenwood, D. 2011. The problem of coordination in politics: what critics of neoliberalism might draw from its advocates. Polity. 43 (1), pp. 36-57. doi:10.1057/pol.2010.22

Facing complexity: democracy, expertise and the discovery process
Greenwood, D. 2010. Facing complexity: democracy, expertise and the discovery process. Political Studies. 58 (4), pp. 769-788. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00851.x

Markets, large projects and sustainable development: traditional and new planning in the Thames Gateway
Greenwood, D. and Newman, P. 2010. Markets, large projects and sustainable development: traditional and new planning in the Thames Gateway. Urban Studies. 47 (1), pp. 105-119. doi:10.1177/0042098009346864

From market to non-market: an autonomous agent approach to central planning
Greenwood, D. 2009. From market to non-market: an autonomous agent approach to central planning. in: Bullock, S., Noble, J., Watson, R. and Bedau, M.A. (ed.) Artificial Life XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems Cambridge, MA MIT Press.

Non-market coordination: towards an ecological response to Austrian economics
Greenwood, D. 2008. Non-market coordination: towards an ecological response to Austrian economics. Environmental Values. 17 (4), pp. 521-541. doi:10.3197/096327108X368520

From market to non-market: an autonomous agent approach to central planning
Greenwood, D. 2007. From market to non-market: an autonomous agent approach to central planning. Knowledge Engineering Review. 22 (4), pp. 349-360. doi:10.1017/S0269888907001129

Planning and know-how: the relationship between knowledge and calculation in Hayek's case for markets
Greenwood, D. 2007. Planning and know-how: the relationship between knowledge and calculation in Hayek's case for markets. Review of Political Economy. 19 (3), pp. 419-434. doi:10.1080/09538250701453113

The halfway house: democracy, complexity, and the limits to markets in green political economy
Greenwood, D. 2007. The halfway house: democracy, complexity, and the limits to markets in green political economy. Environmental Politics. 16 (1), pp. 73-91. doi:10.1080/09644010601073648

Commensurability and beyond: from Mises and Neurath to the future of the socialist calculation debate
Greenwood, D. 2006. Commensurability and beyond: from Mises and Neurath to the future of the socialist calculation debate. Economy and Society. 35 (1), pp. 65-90. doi:10.1080/03085140500465857

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/q22q3/streamlining-or-watering-down-assessing-the-smartness-of-policy-and-standards-for-the-promotion-of-low-and-zero-carbon-homes-in-england-2010-15


Share this
Tweet
Email