Constitutional Reasoning in the European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: In Search of Public Justification

Frantziou, E. 2019. Constitutional Reasoning in the European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: In Search of Public Justification. European Public Law. 25 (2), p. 183–203.

TitleConstitutional Reasoning in the European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: In Search of Public Justification
TypeJournal article
AuthorsFrantziou, E.
Abstract

This article argues that the CJEU’s use of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in situations falling within the scope of EU law needs to be supplemented by clearer constitutional reasoning about the role of fundamental rights in the public order of the European Union. The article demonstrates, through an analysis of the Charter’s drafting context, that the primary function of this instrument is to highlight the centrality of a set of public goods in the EU, rather than merely to add to the number of individual rights to which EU law gives rise. It is then argued that, in order for this function to be fulfilled, an interpretation of fundamental rights is required that both acknowledges their constitutional value as distinct from other sources of rights protection in the Union and offers adequate reasons for the application of the Charter standard. The idea of public justification provides a suitable starting point, particularly in situations of conflict with national laws, because it would give rise to a much-needed judicial debate about what the best standard of fundamental rights protection would be for the Union. However, such an interpretation of the Charter is currently lacking from the case law which, instead, utilises problematic forms of constitutional and quasi-constitutional discourse, through continued reliance on a conception of rights as tools of enforcement of EU law, which it had advanced in its earlier case law. While this type of reasoning was well suited to the idea of the EU as a social market economy, it structurally precludes the re-imagination of rights as collectively authored claims about good government under the Charter framework.

KeywordsCharter – EUCFR – reasoning – constitutionalism – justification – public sphere – EU public law – fundamental rights
JournalEuropean Public Law
Journal citation25 (2), p. 183–203
ISSN1354-3725
Year2019
PublisherWolters Kluwer
Accepted author manuscript
Web address (URL)http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?id=EURO2019013
Publication dates
Published01 Jun 2019

Related outputs

Brexit and Article 50 TEU: A Constitutionalist Reading
Frantziou, E. and Eeckhout, P. 2017. Brexit and Article 50 TEU: A Constitutionalist Reading. Common Market Law Review. 54 (2017), pp. 695-734.

Brexit and Article 50 TEU: A Constitutionalist Reading
Eeckhout, P. and Frantziou, E. 2016. Brexit and Article 50 TEU: A Constitutionalist Reading. London UCL European Institute.

A ‘right to have rights’ in the EU public sphere? An Arendtian justification for the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
Frantziou, E. 2016. A ‘right to have rights’ in the EU public sphere? An Arendtian justification for the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. University of Birmingham.

The Horizontal Effect of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: Rediscovering the Reasons for Horizontality
Frantziou, E. 2015. The Horizontal Effect of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: Rediscovering the Reasons for Horizontality. European Law Journal. 21 (5), pp. 657-679. doi:10.1111/eulj.12137

‘Further developments in the right to be forgotten: The European Court’s judgment in Case C-131/12, Google Spain, SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos’
Frantziou, E. 2014. ‘Further developments in the right to be forgotten: The European Court’s judgment in Case C-131/12, Google Spain, SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos’. Human Rights Law Review. 14 (4), pp. 761-777. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngu033

Case C-176/12 Association de Médiation Sociale v Hichem Laboubi – Some Reflections on the Horizontal Effect of the Charter and the Reach of Fundamental Employment Rights in the European Union
Frantziou, E. 2014. Case C-176/12 Association de Médiation Sociale v Hichem Laboubi – Some Reflections on the Horizontal Effect of the Charter and the Reach of Fundamental Employment Rights in the European Union. European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst). 10 (2), pp. 332-348. doi:10.1017/S1574019614001205

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/q4x47/constitutional-reasoning-in-the-european-union-and-the-charter-of-fundamental-rights-in-search-of-public-justification


Share this
Tweet
Email

Usage statistics

125 total views
37 total downloads
1 views this month
3 downloads this month
These values are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created

Export as