Student Perspectives on the Usage of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Students hold diverse views on the application of generative AI in education, showing a nuanced understanding of its implications. They generally agree that using AI to create entire essays for submission is inappropriate, but find its usage acceptable for tasks including code debugging and proofreading. Several areas, such as using generative AI as a personal assistant and even what this means in practice, are contested. Clear guidelines and periodic reviews are needed for appropriate AI use. Regarding assessment, plagiarism detection software is just one tool that should be called upon to tackle AI misuse. Students suggested adapting and/or expanding assessment methods, such as introducing more field trips, interviews, or oral defences alongside written coursework, which many prefer over traditional exams. The university's culture and approach to generative AI play a crucial role. While some students oppose AI literacy, there's a need to offer opportunities for those interested to learn. AI literacy courses could cover coding with ChatGPT, prompt engineering, proofreading, critically evaluating AI outputs, understanding AI mechanics, handling bias, plagiarism, and citation. Dependence on AI should be discouraged in favour of promoting human involvement. Ongoing collaboration between students and the institution is essential. The complex landscape of generative AI in education calls for a balanced approach that respects student concerns while leveraging AI's potential to enhance teaching and learning.