The efforts to limit the International Criminal Court's jurisdiction over nationals of non-party states: a comparative study

Roscini, M. 2006. The efforts to limit the International Criminal Court's jurisdiction over nationals of non-party states: a comparative study. Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. 5 (3), pp. 495-527.

TitleThe efforts to limit the International Criminal Court's jurisdiction over nationals of non-party states: a comparative study
AuthorsRoscini, M.
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to discuss and compare the multilateral and bilateral efforts to prevent the ICC from exercising its jurisdiction over nationals of states non-parties to the Rome Statute. In particular, the US secured the adoption of Security Council resolutions no. 1422 (2002), 1487 (2003), 1497 (2003), 1593 (2005) and launched a campaign for the conclusion of bilateral non-surrender agreements: the differences between the resolutions and between them and the agreements are analysed. None of the resolutions above can be qualified as an exercise of the Security Council's power to request the ICC not to commence or proceed with investigations or prosecutions under Article 16 of the Rome Statute, as this provision was not conceived to cover future and hypothetical cases. Furthermore, by adopting resolutions 1422 and 1487 and by including the paragraphs on the exclusive jurisdiction of the contributing state in resolutions 1497 and 1593, the Security Council acted ultra vires, since no threat to the peace can be found in order to justify the exercise of Chapter VII powers. The resolutions are also in contrast with the principles and purposes of the UN. As to the bilateral non-surrender agreements, they cannot be qualified as "international agreements pursuant to which the consent of the sending State is required to surrender a person of that State to the Court" as required by Article 98 (2) of the Statute, since they prohibit the surrender to the ICC of any individual who is "present" on the territory of the other party and they do not require the state to which the accused has been transferred to investigate and prosecute the case. Should Italy conclude a non-surrender agreement with the US, it would incur international responsibility. The law giving effect to such an agreement in the Italian legal order would also be in contrast with Articles 10 (1) and 11 of the Constitution.

JournalLaw and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals
Journal citation5 (3), pp. 495-527
ISSN1571-8034
Year2006
FileRoscini_2006_final_author_version.pdf
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1163/157180306778938683
Publication dates
Published2006

Related outputs

To what degree do the difficulties in tracing the author of the attack and assessing the extent of the effects remain a challenge for addressing the legal issues raised by “cyber weapons”?
Roscini, M. 2017. To what degree do the difficulties in tracing the author of the attack and assessing the extent of the effects remain a challenge for addressing the legal issues raised by “cyber weapons”? in: de Vidts, B. and Beruto, G.L. (ed.) Weapons and the International Rule of Law Milan, Italy Angeli Franco Editore. pp. 229-234

Animals and the law of armed conflict
Roscini, M. 2017. Animals and the law of armed conflict. Israel Yearbook on Human Rights. 47, pp. 35-67.

Military objectives in cyber warfare
Roscini, M. 2017. Military objectives in cyber warfare. in: Taddeo, M. and Glorioso, L. (ed.) Ethics and Policies for Cyber Operations Springer. pp. 99-113

On the 'inherent' character of the right of states to self-defence
Roscini, M. 2016. On the 'inherent' character of the right of states to self-defence. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. 4 (3), pp. 634-660.

Digital evidence as a means of proof before the International Court of Justice
Roscini, M. 2016. Digital evidence as a means of proof before the International Court of Justice. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 21 (3), pp. 541-554.

Is there any room for the doctrine of fundamental rights of states in today's international law?
Joyner Daniel, H. and Roscini, M. 2015. Is there any room for the doctrine of fundamental rights of states in today's international law? Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. 4 (3), pp. 467-481.

On Certain Legal Issues Arising from Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
Roscini, M. 2015. On Certain Legal Issues Arising from Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. in: Caraccioli, I., Pedrazzi, M., Vassalli di Dachenhausen, T. and Caracciolo, I. (ed.) Nuclear Weapons: Strengthening International Legal Regime The Hague, The Netherlands Eleven International Publishing. pp. 15-22

Evidentiary issues in international disputes related to state responsibility for cyber operations
Roscini, M. 2015. Evidentiary issues in international disputes related to state responsibility for cyber operations. in: Finkelstein, C., Ohlin, J.D. and Govern, K. (ed.) Cyber war - Law and ethics for virtual conflicts Oxford Oxford University Press. pp. 215-248

Evidentiary issues in international disputes related to state responsibility for cyber operations
Roscini, M. 2015. Evidentiary issues in international disputes related to state responsibility for cyber operations. Texas International Law Journal. 50 (2), pp. 233-273.

Cyber operations as a use of force
Roscini, M. 2015. Cyber operations as a use of force. in: Tsagourias, N. and Buchan, R. (ed.) Research handbook on international law and cyberspace Cheltenham Edward Elgar. pp. 233-254

International law, nuclear weapon-free zones and the proposed zone free of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East
Roscini, M. 2014. International law, nuclear weapon-free zones and the proposed zone free of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East. in: Nystuen, G., Casey-Maslen, S. and Golden Bersagel, A. (ed.) Nuclear weapons under international law Cambridge Cambridge University Press. pp. 321-346

Establishing state responsibility for historical injustices: the Armenian case
Roscini, M. 2014. Establishing state responsibility for historical injustices: the Armenian case. International Criminal Law Review. 14 (2), pp. 291-316.

Cyber-opérations et principe de proportionnalité en droit international humanitaire
Roscini, M. 2014. Cyber-opérations et principe de proportionnalité en droit international humanitaire. in: Société française pour le droit international, Internet et le droit international (Colloque de Rouen) Paris Pedone. pp. 261-271

Cyber operations and the use of force in international law
Roscini, M. 2014. Cyber operations and the use of force in international law. Oxford Oxford University Press.

Cyber operations as nuclear counterproliferation measures
Roscini, M. 2014. Cyber operations as nuclear counterproliferation measures. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 19 (1), pp. 133-157.

Withdrawal from and termination of non-proliferation treaties
Roscini, M. and Joyner, D.H. 2012. Withdrawal from and termination of non-proliferation treaties. in: Joyner, D.H. and Roscini, M. (ed.) Non-proliferation law as a special regime Cambridge Cambridge University Press. pp. 151-171

Introduction
Roscini, M. and Joyner, D.H. 2012. Introduction. in: Joyner, D.H. and Roscini, M. (ed.) Non-proliferation law as a special regime Cambridge Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-14

Conclusions
Roscini, M. and Joyner, D.H. 2012. Conclusions. in: Joyner, D.H. and Roscini, M. (ed.) Non-proliferation law as a special regime Cambridge Cambridge University Press. pp. 270-277

Negative security assurances in the protocols additional to the treaties establishing nuclear weapon-free zones
Roscini, M. 2011. Negative security assurances in the protocols additional to the treaties establishing nuclear weapon-free zones. in: Gartner, H. (ed.) Obama and the Bomb - The Vision of a World Free of Nuclear Weapons Frankfurt am Main Peter Lang.

World wide warfare: Jus ad bellum and the use of cyber force
Roscini, M. 2010. World wide warfare: Jus ad bellum and the use of cyber force. in: von Bogdandy, A., Wolfrum, R. and Philipp, C.E. (ed.) Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Leiden Martinus Nijhoff.

The United Nations Security Council and the enforcement of international humanitarian law
Roscini, M. 2010. The United Nations Security Council and the enforcement of international humanitarian law. Israel Law Review. 43 (2), pp. 330-359.

Book review: Daniel H. Joyner, International law and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)
Roscini, M. 2010. Book review: Daniel H. Joyner, International law and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009). International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 59 (3), pp. 883-884.

Neighbourhood watch? The African Great Lakes Pact and ius ad bellum
Roscini, M. 2009. Neighbourhood watch? The African Great Lakes Pact and ius ad bellum. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht. 69 (4), pp. 931-959.

Something old, something new: the 2006 Semipalatinsk Treaty on a nuclear weapon-free zone in Central Asia
Roscini, M. 2008. Something old, something new: the 2006 Semipalatinsk Treaty on a nuclear weapon-free zone in Central Asia. Chinese Journal of International Law. 7 (3), pp. 593-624.

Protection of natural environment in time of armed conflict
Roscini, M. 2008. Protection of natural environment in time of armed conflict. in: Bhuiyan, J.H., Doswald-Beck, L. and Chowdhury, A.R. (ed.) International humanitarian law: an anthology Nagpur LexisNexis Butterworths. pp. 155-179

Editorial
Roscini, M. 2008. Editorial. International Community Law Review. 10 (2), pp. 107-108.

Book review: Diritto internazionale-Problemi fondamentali by Tullio Treves [Giuffrè, Milano, 2005, 782 pp, ISBN 8814112967, €55 (p/bk)]
Roscini, M. 2008. Book review: Diritto internazionale-Problemi fondamentali by Tullio Treves [Giuffrè, Milano, 2005, 782 pp, ISBN 8814112967, €55 (p/bk)]. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 57 (2), pp. 487-489.

Book review: Comunità internazionale e obblighi «erga omnes» by Paolo Picone [Jovene, Napoli, 2006, 684 pp, ISBN 8824316018, €35 (p/bk)]
Roscini, M. 2008. Book review: Comunità internazionale e obblighi «erga omnes» by Paolo Picone [Jovene, Napoli, 2006, 684 pp, ISBN 8824316018, €35 (p/bk)]. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 57 (2), pp. 489-451.

Threats of armed force and contemporary international law
Roscini, M. 2007. Threats of armed force and contemporary international law. Netherlands International Law Review. 54 (2), pp. 229-277.

Great expectations: the implementation of the Rome Statute in Italy
Roscini, M. 2007. Great expectations: the implementation of the Rome Statute in Italy. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 5 (2), pp. 493-512.

La giurisdizione della Corte penale internazionale tra risoluzioni del Consiglio di sicurezza e accordi bilaterali di esenzione (The international criminal court’s jurisdiction between security council resolutions and bilateral exemption agreements)
Roscini, M. 2007. La giurisdizione della Corte penale internazionale tra risoluzioni del Consiglio di sicurezza e accordi bilaterali di esenzione (The international criminal court’s jurisdiction between security council resolutions and bilateral exemption agreements). in: Comunicazioni e Studi Giuffrè.

La giurisdizione della Corte penale internazionale tra risoluzioni del Consiglio di sicurezza e accordi bilaterali di esenzione
Roscini, M. 2007. La giurisdizione della Corte penale internazionale tra risoluzioni del Consiglio di sicurezza e accordi bilaterali di esenzione. in: Lanciotti, A. and Tanzi, A. (ed.) Le immunità nel diritto internazionale : temi scelti : atti del Convegno di Perugia, 23-25 maggo 2006 Turin Giappichelli. pp. 83-115

Targeting and contemporary aerial bombardment
Roscini, M. 2005. Targeting and contemporary aerial bombardment. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 54 (2), pp. 411-444.

Italy: Law reform needed to implement the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Roscini, M. 2005. Italy: Law reform needed to implement the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Amnesty International.

I compiti delle Forze di pace dell'Unione Europea' (The tasks of the EU peace-keeping forces)
Roscini, M. 2005. I compiti delle Forze di pace dell'Unione Europea' (The tasks of the EU peace-keeping forces). in: Ronzitti, N. (ed.) Le forze di pace dell'Unione Europea (The peace-keeping forces of the European Union) Catanzaro, Italy Rubbettino. pp. 49-79

Democratic Republic of the Congo. Comments and recommendations of the July 2003 draft law implementing the Rome statute of the international criminal court
Roscini, M. 2004. Democratic Republic of the Congo. Comments and recommendations of the July 2003 draft law implementing the Rome statute of the international criminal court. London Amnesty International.

Le zone denuclearizzate (Nuclear weapon-free zones)
Roscini, M. 2003. Le zone denuclearizzate (Nuclear weapon-free zones). Turin, Italy G. Giappichelli.

The navigational rights of nuclear ships
Roscini, M. 2002. The navigational rights of nuclear ships. Leiden Journal of International Law. 15 (1), pp. 251-265.

La zone denuclearisee du sud-est asiatique: prpblemes de droit de la mer
Roscini, M. 2001. La zone denuclearisee du sud-est asiatique: prpblemes de droit de la mer. Revue Generale de Droit. 105, pp. 617-645.

La sesta Conferenza di riesame del Trattato sulla non proliferazione delle armi nucleari
Roscini, M. 2000. La sesta Conferenza di riesame del Trattato sulla non proliferazione delle armi nucleari. La Communita internazionale. 55, pp. 661-685.

La libertà di esprimere dichiarazioni razziste e blasfeme nella giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo
Roscini, M. 1998. La libertà di esprimere dichiarazioni razziste e blasfeme nella giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo. Rivista internazionale dei diritti dell’uomo. 11, pp. 95-118.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/92731/the-efforts-to-limit-the-international-criminal-court-s-jurisdiction-over-nationals-of-non-party-states-a-comparative-study


Share this
Tweet
Email