Northern Heartlands Great Place Scheme Final Evaluation & Completion Report

Clarke, R. and Anteric, M. 2020. Northern Heartlands Great Place Scheme Final Evaluation & Completion Report. London CEPAR.

TitleNorthern Heartlands Great Place Scheme Final Evaluation & Completion Report
AuthorsClarke, R. and Anteric, M.
TypeTechnical report
Abstract

The Great Place (GP) programme was a pilot venture between the National Lottery Heritage Fund (NLHF), Arts Council England (ACE) and Historic England (HE) launched in fulfilment of a commitment of the government’s (2016) Culture White Paper. Based around the catchment of two rivers – the Tees and the Wear – and extending from their sources in the North Pennines to the lowland arc through which they flow, the £2m Northern Heartlands (NH) Great Place scheme includes six market towns, a number of former mining communities of the Durham coalfield and numerous isolated hill farms and villages of the rural upper Dales. NH is distinctive in that it recognises that the places where people live and work are cultural landscapes, constantly changing and embodying contested heritage and values. It has sought to investigate and manifest the role of arts and artists, working with local communities, through its declared mission:
“To deliver cultural activities that transform people’s understanding of the heritage, landscapes and places they live in, building their confidence and ability to influence policy and decision-making.”
This commissioned report fulfils the requirement of NLHF and ACE for an evaluation of the NH scheme. It concludes that the central feature of NH’s success has been the ability of the delivery team and partners to establish close links with and secure the trust of local communities, using a wide and inclusive definition of ‘culture’ to move beyond the distinctions between ‘arts’ and ‘heritage’ and to function not as ‘missionaries’ but rather as ‘mediators’ and ‘mobilisers’. In the three short years of delivery and despite the lack of a development phase, NH has proved itself as a unique and ambitious initiative. The commitment and expertise of the NH team and delivery partners and the enthusiasm of local residents have meant that NH has been able to achieve a great deal
In the process NH has challenged common approaches to the arts as comprised of cultural activities delivered ‘from above’ (a focus of some other GP schemes, sometimes extended to local, vernacular ‘cultures’) by emphasising the centrality of place to people’s lives. At the same time it has also challenged conventional ‘views’ of landscape and place – often restricted to the scenic and eminent — by focusing on the commonplace, from ‘remote rural’ to deindustrialised, not just in theory, but in a practical way, together with local communities acknowledging that values and policies are often contested, representing conflicting social and economic interests.
NH has also highlighted some of challenges of ‘placemaking’ and the contradictions in National Lottery funding – in the heritage, arts and cultural fields, as in other areas. NH will leave behind a varied legacy of cultural engagement amongst local communities. There is evidence that a number of these at least will continue beyond the end of the NH Great Place Scheme. It has also resulted in a deeper understanding of the challenges and strategies for delivering cultural activities ‘from below’, enriching our understanding of the theoretical and policy dimensions of community engagement with arts and culture in relation to heritage, landscape and place.
Credit is due to those involved in the period prior to the award of the GP application who put together such an innovative and pioneering scheme and to the NH core team, partners, local communities and artists involved in delivering it. Their significant achievements have demonstrably ‘made a difference’ in the area, and in particular to participants and communities involved, and have pointed the way for related activities in the future.

Keywordsart
community
culture
heritage
place
policy
power
Year2020
PublisherCEPAR
Place of publicationLondon
Publication dates
PublishedOct 2020
Page range66pp
File
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)

Related outputs

Tooting Common Heritage Project: Final Evaluation & Completion Report
Clarke, R. 2020. Tooting Common Heritage Project: Final Evaluation & Completion Report. London London Borough of Wandsworth.

Climate, capital, class & crisis
Clarke, R. 2020. Climate, capital, class & crisis. Theory and Struggle. 121, pp. 32 - 43. https://doi.org/10.3828/ts.2020.6

Living Wandle Landscape Partnership: Final Evaluation & Completion Report
Clarke, R. and Anteric, M. 2018. Living Wandle Landscape Partnership: Final Evaluation & Completion Report. Living Wandle Landscape Partnership.

Final Evaluation of the Heart of Teesdale Landscape Partnership
Clarke, R. 2016. Final Evaluation of the Heart of Teesdale Landscape Partnership. Durham County Council/ Heart of Teesdale Landscape Partnership.

‘Really useful’ knowledge and 19th century adult worker education – what lessons for today?
Clarke, R. 2016. ‘Really useful’ knowledge and 19th century adult worker education – what lessons for today? Theory and Struggle. 117, pp. 67-74. https://doi.org/10.3828/ts.2016.17

Self-help, Saving and Suburbanisation - the Birkbeck Freehold Land and Building Societies, their Bank and the London Mechanics’ Institute 1851 – 1911.
Clarke, R. 2015. Self-help, Saving and Suburbanisation - the Birkbeck Freehold Land and Building Societies, their Bank and the London Mechanics’ Institute 1851 – 1911. The London Journal. 40 (2), pp. 123-146. https://doi.org/10.1179/0305803415Z.00000000064

Beyond landscape designation: innovative funding, delivery and governance and the UK protected area system
Clarke, R. 2015. Beyond landscape designation: innovative funding, delivery and governance and the UK protected area system . Management of Environmental Quality. 26 (2), pp. 172-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2014-0106

Dead spaces? Grave matters
Clarke, R. 1990. Dead spaces? Grave matters. in: 48th Joint Conference Report London Institute of Burial and Cremation Administration and Federation of British Cremation Authorities. pp. 52-72

‘Really useful’ knowledge? The London Mechanics’ Institution and the struggle for (independent) working class education
Clarke, R. 2014. ‘Really useful’ knowledge? The London Mechanics’ Institution and the struggle for (independent) working class education. Post-16 Educator. 76, pp. 18-20.

Windermere Reflections Landscape Partnership Final Evaluation
Clarke, R. and Anteric, M. 2014. Windermere Reflections Landscape Partnership Final Evaluation. CEPAR.

Caradon Hill Area Heritage Project Final Evaluation and Completion Report
Clarke, R. and Anteric, M. 2014. Caradon Hill Area Heritage Project Final Evaluation and Completion Report. Scorrier, UK Cornwall Council and CEPAR.

Landscape conservation action plan guidance
Clarke, R. and Mount, D. 2013. Landscape conservation action plan guidance. London Heritage Lottery Fund.

Evaluation guidance
Clarke, R. and Mount, D. 2013. Evaluation guidance. London Heritage Lottery Fund.

Evaluation of the Heritage Lottery Fund Landscape Partnership Programme: report to the Heritage Lottery Fund
Clarke, R., Mount, D. and Anteric, M. 2011. Evaluation of the Heritage Lottery Fund Landscape Partnership Programme: report to the Heritage Lottery Fund. London CEPAR.

Fanny Copeland and the geographical imagination
Clarke, R. and Anteric, M. 2011. Fanny Copeland and the geographical imagination. Scottish Geographical Journal. 127 (3), pp. 163-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2011.628451

Local sustainability initiatives in English National Parks: what role for adaptive governance?
Clark, J.R.A. and Clarke, R. 2011. Local sustainability initiatives in English National Parks: what role for adaptive governance? Land Use Policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use. 28 (1), pp. 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.012

The HLF Landscape Partnerships programme: report to the Heritage Lottery Fund
Clarke, R., Mount, D. and Anteric, M. 2010. The HLF Landscape Partnerships programme: report to the Heritage Lottery Fund. London CEPAR.

Adult education between the wars: the curious case of the Selborne Lecture Bureau
Clarke, R. 2010. Adult education between the wars: the curious case of the Selborne Lecture Bureau. History of Education. 39 (5), pp. 613-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00467601003687572

Self-help and the London Mechanics’ Institution — Birkbeck after (George) Birkbeck
Clarke, R. 2009. Self-help and the London Mechanics’ Institution — Birkbeck after (George) Birkbeck. in: Self Help: Mechanics' Worldwide Conference 2009: Proceedings of the Second International Conference Convened by the Bath Royal Literary and Scientific Institution at BRLSI, 16-18 Queen Square, Bath, England, 24-29 September, 2009 Lowden Publishing Company. pp. 52-65

Mushrooms and fungi
Clarke, R. 2009. Mushrooms and fungi. London Usborne.

Birkbeck places: landscapes of learning?
Clarke, R. 2009. Birkbeck places: landscapes of learning? ‘Putting Education in its Place’: Space, place and materialities in the history of education. History of Education Society annual conference. Halifax Conference Centre, University of Sheffield, UK 04 - 06 Dec 2009

(British) anthropological tourism in Slovenia 1932-2007
Anteric, M. and Clarke, R. 2009. (British) anthropological tourism in Slovenia 1932-2007. Anthropological Notebooks. 15 (1), pp. 5-25.

Študija o Solčavskem: Poročilo o skupnem terenskem delu Univerze v Ljubljani in Univerze v Londonu 1932 - 2007 [Solčavsko Studies 1932 – 2007]
Anko, B., Anteric, M., Košcak, M., Mitchell, I., Lenar, A. and Clarke, R. 2008. Študija o Solčavskem: Poročilo o skupnem terenskem delu Univerze v Ljubljani in Univerze v Londonu 1932 - 2007 [Solčavsko Studies 1932 – 2007]. Ljubljana Univerze v Ljubljani.

Benefits beyond boundaries: a guide to good practice in the management of National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
Clarke, R. and Clark, J. 2006. Benefits beyond boundaries: a guide to good practice in the management of National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. London Draft for English Nature / Natural England. CEPAR.

Informal adult education between the wars: the curious case of the Selbourne Lecture Bureau
Clarke, R. 2005. Informal adult education between the wars: the curious case of the Selbourne Lecture Bureau. London Birkbeck, University of London (publisher).

Evaluation of the National Parks Sustainable Development Fund
Clarke, R., Mount, D., Anteric, M. and Clark, J. 2004. Evaluation of the National Parks Sustainable Development Fund. London CEPAR.

Russell Square: a lifelong resource for teaching and learning
Clarke, R., McKellar, E. and Symes, M. 2004. Russell Square: a lifelong resource for teaching and learning. Birkbeck College, University of London.

Pioneers of conservation: the Selborne Society and the Royal SPB
Clarke, R. 2004. Pioneers of conservation: the Selborne Society and the Royal SPB. London Selborne Society.

Proofing rural lifelong learning
Jackson, S. and Clarke, R. 2003. Proofing rural lifelong learning. London Birkbeck College, University of London.

Lifelong learning in rural areas: a report to the Countryside Agency
Clarke, R., Cara, S., Thompson, A., Gray, F., Jones, B., Jackson, S., Mount, D. and Schuller, T. 2002. Lifelong learning in rural areas: a report to the Countryside Agency. London CEPAR.

Bosnia and Hercegovina
Clarke, R. 2002. Bosnia and Hercegovina. in: Carter, F.W. and Turnock, D. (ed.) Environmental Problems in East Central Europe. 2nd edition London Routledge. pp. 283-304

Yugoslavia
Clarke, R. 2001. Yugoslavia. in: Carter, F.W. and Turnock, D. (ed.) Environmental Problems in East Central Europe. 2nd edition London Routledge. pp. 396-416

Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty Management Plans: a guide
Clarke, R. 2001. Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty Management Plans: a guide. Cheltenham Countryside Agency. https://doi.org/CA23

Nature and landscape conservation in transition in central and south-eastern Europe
Tickle, A. and Clarke, R. 2000. Nature and landscape conservation in transition in central and south-eastern Europe. European Environment. 10 (5), pp. 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0976(200009/10)10:5<211::AID-EET235>3.0.CO;2-8

The other side of the Adriatic: landscape, people and place
Clarke, R. and Anteric, M. 1999. The other side of the Adriatic: landscape, people and place. in: Manzi, E. and Schmidt di Friedberg, M. (ed.) Landscape and sustainability, global change, Mediterranean historic centres: from rediscovery to exploitation Milan Guerini e Associati. pp. 354-365

Computer based project management tools for protected areas
Clarke, R. 1999. Computer based project management tools for protected areas. in: Kovar, P. (ed.) Nature and culture in landscape ecology: experiences for the 3rd milennium Prague Charles University, Karolinum Press. pp. 394-407

Management plans and planning: a guide. CCP527
Clarke, R. and Mount, D. 1998. Management plans and planning: a guide. CCP527. Cheltenham Countryside Commission. https://doi.org/CCP527

Education and training for nature conservation and landscape protection: content, context and competence
Clarke, R. 1998. Education and training for nature conservation and landscape protection: content, context and competence. in: Protection of nature: proceedings of a conference held in Novi Sad, Serbia, 16 December 1998 (in Serbian Cyrillic with English summary) Belgrade Institute of Nature Protection of Serbia. pp. 609-617

Project management in protected areas: a tale of two systems
Clarke, R. 1997. Project management in protected areas: a tale of two systems. International Journal of Project Management. 15 (4), pp. 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00077-4

Interpretation in trust: a century of sustainable stewardship, 1885- 1995
Clarke, R. 1997. Interpretation in trust: a century of sustainable stewardship, 1885- 1995. in: Globalisation and local identity Brussels PACT.

Heritage in trust: sustainable stewardship in transition?
Clarke, R. 1996. Heritage in trust: sustainable stewardship in transition? International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2 (3), pp. 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527259608722168

¿Espacios Muertos o Refugios Viventes?
Clarke, R. 1993. ¿Espacios Muertos o Refugios Viventes? in: Una Arquitectura para la Muerte Seville Junta de Andalucia. pp. 355-362

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/v25xw/northern-heartlands-great-place-scheme-final-evaluation-completion-report


Share this
Tweet
Email

Usage statistics

31 total views
30 total downloads
1 views this month
2 downloads this month
These values are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created

Export as