A literature review on the privatisation of public space

Littlefield, D. and Devereux, M. 2017. A literature review on the privatisation of public space.

TitleA literature review on the privatisation of public space
AuthorsLittlefield, D. and Devereux, M.
TypeProject report
Abstract

This literature review was undertaken at the request of Grosvenor Estates in order to better understand the academic context and literature around the perceived phenomenon of the privatisation of public space. The review considered a range of print material including peer reviewed academic papers (the focus of the study), newspaper articles, and reports and position papers by public bodies / think tanks.

The subject is, in short, a complex and nuanced one. Some writers are very vocal opponents of private-owned public space. Such criticism is arguably a natural and important consequence of the social and economic patterns which are playing out at the interface of public and private domains. Others take a more pragmatic view and see the partnership between public and private interests as addressing the changing governance model of cities, and as a way of providing high quality, desirable 'public' space for the contemporary city.

The review explores issues such as:

- how is the public defined?
- how is public space defined?
- is there clarity over the extent to which private operators have assumed ownership of once public space, compared with providing access to space that was formerly inaccessible?
- do all public spaces have to serve all publics? Is there a danger that, in seeking to be open to all social groups, public spaces might satisfy nobody?
- do the boundary conditions clearly demarcate the public/private interface, or is the threshold zone more fuzzy and indeterminate? How does a user know where they are? Does the user need to know anything of the ownership of the space they are in?
- is there a distinction between private and civic space?
- how does society guide and moderate behaviours, and how does the control of these behaviours vary (if at all) between the public and private sectors?
- how might an urban “right to roam” change the user/owner culture? Might a “law of place” be a useful way forward?

As such it serves as solid basis for further exploration of the themes discussed so as to enhance knowledge and to impact upon the future design of urban public space.

Keywordspublic space
private space
urban design
privatisation of public space
Year2017
Publication dates
Published02 Jan 2017
FunderGrosvenor Estates

Related outputs

What is a thing? Considering the 'extended object' and the relationships from which it emerges.
Littlefield, D. 2023. What is a thing? Considering the 'extended object' and the relationships from which it emerges. London Conference in Critical Thought. London Metropolitan University 30 Jun - 01 Jul 2023

Plural Authenticities: How Can Digital Representation Enhance, Extend and Even Rival the Original Object?
Littlefield, D. 2023. Plural Authenticities: How Can Digital Representation Enhance, Extend and Even Rival the Original Object? in: Griffin, H. (ed.) (In)tangible Heritage(s): a conference on design, culture and technology - past, present and future Architecture, Media, Politics, Society (AMPS) Proceedings Journal Series. pp. 88-99

The agency of small things: indicators of ownership on the streets of Liverpool and Belfast
Littlefield, D. 2023. The agency of small things: indicators of ownership on the streets of Liverpool and Belfast. in: Martire, A., Hausleitner, B. and Clossick, J. (ed.) Everyday Streets: inclusive approaches to understanding and designing streets London UCL Press. pp. 17-32

A House and its Atmosphere
Littlefield, D. 2020. A House and its Atmosphere. Home cultures: The Journal of Architecture, Design and Domestic Space. 17 (3), pp. 233-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17406315.2020.1954401

Replicas and representation – reflections on authenticity at Bath Abbey
Littlefield, D. 2020. Replicas and representation – reflections on authenticity at Bath Abbey. University of Stirling.

Time and value at Bath Abbey: Erosion, fragmentation and the role of the replica
Littlefield, D. 2020. Time and value at Bath Abbey: Erosion, fragmentation and the role of the replica. ACHS 2020 Futures: the fifth biennial conference of the Association of Critical Heritage Studies. University College London, UK 26 - 30 Aug 2020

Creating Interior Atmosphere: mise-en-scène and interior design
Littlefield, D. 2019. Creating Interior Atmosphere: mise-en-scène and interior design. Interiors Design/Architecture/Culture. 9 (3), pp. 376-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2019.1616925

Authentic reconstruction: authenticity, architecture and the built Heritage
Littlefield, D. 2019. Authentic reconstruction: authenticity, architecture and the built Heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 25 (2), pp. 221-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1476399

Urban design, place and integration: A study of Liverpool one
Littlefield, D. and Devereux, M. 2019. Urban design, place and integration: A study of Liverpool one.

Heritage and time: mapping what is not there
Littlefield, D. 2017. Heritage and time: mapping what is not there. in: Counsell, J., Mahdjoubi, L. and Arayici, Y. (ed.) Heritage Building Information Modelling Oxford Routledge. pp. 32-44

The living and the dead; an investigation into the status of erasure within the floor of Bath Abbey
Littlefield, D. 2016. The living and the dead; an investigation into the status of erasure within the floor of Bath Abbey. Interiors Design/Architecture/Culture. 7 (1), pp. 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2016.1163957

Architecture and Culture / Transgression: body and space
Sara, R. and Littlefield, D. 2014. Architecture and Culture / Transgression: body and space. Architecture and Culture. 2 (3), pp. 295-304. https://doi.org/10.2752/205078214X14107818390513

Ashes thrown to the wind; the elusive nature of transgression
Littlefield, D. 2013. Ashes thrown to the wind; the elusive nature of transgression. in: Sara, R. and Mosley, J. (ed.) The Architecture of Transgression / Architectural Design Chichester Wiley. pp. 124-129

Installation and performance
Littlefield, D. 2013. Installation and performance. in: Brooker, G. and Weinthal, L. (ed.) The Handbook of Interior Architecture and Design London Bloomsbury. pp. 226-238

Datum
Littlefield, D. and Wilder, K. 2012. Datum.

Heritage at the Periphery; the York Street vaults, the Roman baths, Bath
Littlefield, D. 2012. Heritage at the Periphery; the York Street vaults, the Roman baths, Bath. in: Morrow, R. and Abdelmonem, M. (ed.) Peripheries Oxford Routledge. pp. 129-141

New Architecture Japan
Littlefield, D., Pollock, N., Sumner, E. (photographer) and Sumner, Y. 2010. New Architecture Japan. London, New York Merrell.

Good Office Design
Littlefield, D. 2009. Good Office Design. London RIBA.

Liverpool One: Remaking a City Centre
Littlefield, D. 2009. Liverpool One: Remaking a City Centre. London Wiley.

HOME: Investing in Design
Littlefield, D. 2008. HOME: Investing in Design. London Wiley.

Space Craft: developments in architectural computing
Littlefield, D. Littlefield, D. (ed.) 2008. Space Craft: developments in architectural computing. London RIBA.

Architectural voices: listening to old buildings
Littlefield, D. and Lewis, S 2007. Architectural voices: listening to old buildings. London Wiley.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/vq14w/a-literature-review-on-the-privatisation-of-public-space


Share this

Usage statistics

171 total views
1 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.