|Chapter title||Ashes thrown to the wind; the elusive nature of transgression|
|Editors||Sara, R. and Mosley, J.|
Transgression is not absolute. What constitutes a transgression is forever in flux, being redefined with the mores of society. The potential for transgression also does not halt with the completion of a building. David Littlefield examines the temporal character of transgression in relation to lived‐in buildings, and the manner in which transgression lodges itself between a building and an idea. Here transgression is a byproduct of the occupiers, sometimes to the extent that a building can take on unbearably horrific associations.
|Book title||The Architecture of Transgression / Architectural Design|
|Published||01 Nov 2013|
|Place of publication||Chichester|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1686|
|Web address (URL)||https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ad.1686|