Intersectionality and co-production in disability and physical activity research: critical reflections on promise, negotiation and transformation

Williams, T.L., Gabriel, A., Falcon, T., Bunbury, S., Marks, K., Bigord, N. and Whawell, S. 2026. Intersectionality and co-production in disability and physical activity research: critical reflections on promise, negotiation and transformation. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2026.2616516

TitleIntersectionality and co-production in disability and physical activity research: critical reflections on promise, negotiation and transformation
TypeJournal article
AuthorsWilliams, T.L., Gabriel, A., Falcon, T., Bunbury, S., Marks, K., Bigord, N. and Whawell, S.
Abstract

Scholars undertaking intersectional research are called upon to address issues of power, positionality, and difference throughout their research. Equitable and experientially informed co-production complements intersectionality with shared principles that centre marginalised voices and interrogate power dynamics. This article responds to the lack of guidance in integrating these two approaches by exploring our experiences of adopting an intersectional approach to co-production. We critically reflect upon the challenges and opportunities of co-production in our intersectional research into inequalities faced by disabled people in relation to physical activity. In collaboration with the UK’s leading organisation for disabled people, Disability Rights UK (DR UK), we created the Moving Intersectionality co-production group that is comprised of disabled people from diverse backgrounds. Reflexive thematic analysis of seven co-production meeting notes, 36 reflective diaries, and nine interviews with co-production partners resulted in the construction of three themes: 1) the paradox of co-production: promise versus reality; 2) negotiating power and conflict in relationship-building; and 3) transformations through shared learning. Taken together, these themes illustrate that intersectional approaches to co-production have the potential to foster equitable relationships for research if they are foregrounded in extensive collective reflexivity. Collective reflexivity enabled us to critically evaluate the challenges we experienced in upholding our co-production principles such as navigating how power between co-production partners was shaping our research. To conclude, we call for further research to utilise intersectionality and co-production as complementary approaches to advance the practice of co-production, to reduce social inequalities and to promote social justice.

JournalQualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health
ISSN2159-676X
2159-6778
Year2026
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Publisher's version
License
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2026.2616516
Publication dates
Published13 Feb 2026

Related outputs

The reasonableness of providing British sign language as a “reasonable adjustment for those wanting access to an ‘experience’”
Bunbury, S. 2026. The reasonableness of providing British sign language as a “reasonable adjustment for those wanting access to an ‘experience’”. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 26 (2), pp. 312-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/13582291251393868

A case for challenging traditional assessments: a student-ledworkshop as an authentic approach to assessment in law and beyond
Bunbury, S. 2025. A case for challenging traditional assessments: a student-ledworkshop as an authentic approach to assessment in law and beyond. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2025.2553296

Essential Contract Law for SQE1
Motson, F and Bunbury, S. 2025. Essential Contract Law for SQE1. Routledge.

Celebrate Black History Year and tackle racial inequality all year long
Husbands, D., Bunbury, S. and Anand, D. 2024. Celebrate Black History Year and tackle racial inequality all year long. Times Higher Education.

How to be an anti-racist ally on the university campus
Bunbury, S., Husbands, D. and Anand, D. 2023. How to be an anti-racist ally on the university campus. Times Higher Education.

The Law School Degree Show: law, materiality, decolonisation and authentic assessment
Bunbury, S. and Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas 2023. The Law School Degree Show: law, materiality, decolonisation and authentic assessment. The Law Teacher. 57 (2), pp. 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2022.2161248

Reasonable Adjustments vs. Indirect Discrimination: are all Protected Characteristics Equal Under the UK Equality Act 2010? A Review of Religious and Disability Discrimination in Employment Cases
Bacquet, S. and Bunbury, S. 2022. Reasonable Adjustments vs. Indirect Discrimination: are all Protected Characteristics Equal Under the UK Equality Act 2010? A Review of Religious and Disability Discrimination in Employment Cases. Law & Justice - the Christian Law Review. 188, pp. 6-20.

An Analysis of the Service Provider’s Legal Duty to Make Reasonable Adjustments: The Little Mix Saga
Bunbury, S. 2020. An Analysis of the Service Provider’s Legal Duty to Make Reasonable Adjustments: The Little Mix Saga. Entertainment and Sports Law Journal. 18 (1) 2. https://doi.org/10.16997/eslj.231

Disability in higher education: do reasonable adjustments contribute to an inclusive curriculum?
Bunbury, S. 2020. Disability in higher education: do reasonable adjustments contribute to an inclusive curriculum? International Journal of Inclusive Education. 24 (9), pp. 964-979. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1503347

Unconscious bias and the medical model: How the social model may hold the key to transformative thinking about disability discrimination
Bunbury, S. 2019. Unconscious bias and the medical model: How the social model may hold the key to transformative thinking about disability discrimination. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 19 (1), pp. 26-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229118820742

The employer's duty to make reasonable adjustments: when is a reasonable adjustment, not reasonable?
Bunbury, S. 2009. The employer's duty to make reasonable adjustments: when is a reasonable adjustment, not reasonable? International Journal of Discrimination Law. 10 (3), pp. 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/135822910901000302

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/x587v/intersectionality-and-co-production-in-disability-and-physical-activity-research-critical-reflections-on-promise-negotiation-and-transformation


Share this

Usage statistics

13 total views
11 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.