Task Competency in the Rights Analytic: Mental Health and the Justification for Rights and Duties

Clayton Thompson, J. 2016. Task Competency in the Rights Analytic: Mental Health and the Justification for Rights and Duties. Inaugural UK Mental Disability Law Conference. University of Nottingham, Nottingham 30 Jun - 01 Jul 2016

TitleTask Competency in the Rights Analytic: Mental Health and the Justification for Rights and Duties
AuthorsClayton Thompson, J.
TypeConference paper
Abstract

The paper concerns the moral status of persons for the purposes of rights-holding and duty-bearing. Developing from Gewirth’s argument to the Principle of Generic Consistency (PGC) and Beyleveld et al.’s Principle of Precautionary Reasoning, I argue in favour of a capacity-based assessment of the task competencies required for choice-rights and certain duties (within the Hohfeldian analytic). Unlike other, traditional, theories of rights, I claim that precautionary reasoning as to agentic status holds the base justification for rights-holding. If this is the basis for generic legal rights, then the contingent argument must be used to explain communities of rights.

Much in the same way as two ‘normal’ adult agents may not have equal rights to be an aeroplane pilot, not all adults hold the same task competencies in relation to the exercise of the generic rights to freedom derived from the PGC. In this paper, I set out to consider the rights held by children, persons suffering from mental illness and generic ‘full’ agents. In mapping the developing ‘portfolio’ of rights and duties that a person carries during their life we might better understand the legal relations of those who do not ostensibly fulfil the criteria of ‘full’ agent.

KeywordsGewirth, Mental Health, Beyleveld, Rights, Duties, Principle of Generic Consistency, Principle of Precautionary Reasoning, Task Competency, Capacity, Practical Reason
Year2016
ConferenceInaugural UK Mental Disability Law Conference

Related outputs

Dude Looks Like a Lady: Gender Deception, Consent and Ethics
Brooks, V. and Clayton Thompson, J. 2019. Dude Looks Like a Lady: Gender Deception, Consent and Ethics. Journal of Criminal Law. 83 (4), pp. 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018319834373

All-or-Nothing: Mental Capacity, Autonomy and Consent
Clayton Thompson, J. Forthcoming. All-or-Nothing: Mental Capacity, Autonomy and Consent. Second UK Mental Disability Law Conference. University of Nottingham 26 - 27 Jun 2018

Male Suicide, Masculinity and Vulnerability
Clayton Thompson, J. Forthcoming. Male Suicide, Masculinity and Vulnerability. Second UK Mental Disability Law Conference. University of Nottingham 26 - 27 Jun 2018

The Rights Network: 100 Years of the Hohfeldian Rights Analytic
Clayton Thompson, J. 2018. The Rights Network: 100 Years of the Hohfeldian Rights Analytic. Laws. 7 (3) 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7030028

All or Nothing: Capacity, Vulnerability and Autonomy
Clayton Thompson, J. 2018. All or Nothing: Capacity, Vulnerability and Autonomy. Socio-Legal Studies Association 2018. University of Bristol, UK 27 - 29 Mar 2018

Let’s talk about sex: deception, ethics and consent
Clayton Thompson, J. and Brooks, V. 2018. Let’s talk about sex: deception, ethics and consent. Socio-Legal Studies Association 2018. University of Bristol, UK 27 - 29 Mar 2018

All-or-Nothing: Capacity, Vulnerability and Autonomy
Clayton Thompson, J. 2017. All-or-Nothing: Capacity, Vulnerability and Autonomy. Westminster Law School Seminar Series. University of Westminster, London 30 - 30 Nov 2017

Law, Rights and Reproduction: Reproductive Autonomy in Ethical Rationalism
Clayton Thompson, J. 2016. Law, Rights and Reproduction: Reproductive Autonomy in Ethical Rationalism. PhD thesis University of Westminster Law https://doi.org/10.34737/9y598

Rights, Rationality and Reproduction: Balancing Interests in the Abortion Debate
Clayton Thompson, J. 2016. Rights, Rationality and Reproduction: Balancing Interests in the Abortion Debate. Gender and Sexuality: Identities, Institutions, and Intersectionality. University of Westminster 13 May 2016

Avoiding Reproduction: Law, Rights and Morality
Clayton Thompson, J. 2016. Avoiding Reproduction: Law, Rights and Morality. Graduate School Assembly. University of Westminster 16 Mar 2016

Rationality, Autonomy, Reproduction
Clayton Thompson, J. 2015. Rationality, Autonomy, Reproduction. Law Doctoral Seminar Series 2015. University of Westminster 28 Oct 2015

You Can't Always Get What You Want: A Gewirthian Model of Rational Autonomy in Abortion
Clayton Thompson, J. 2015. You Can't Always Get What You Want: A Gewirthian Model of Rational Autonomy in Abortion. HEAL Seminar Series. University of Southampton 25 Nov 2015

You Can't Always Get What You Want: A Gewirthian Model of Rational Autonomy in Abortion
Clayton Thompson, J. 2015. You Can't Always Get What You Want: A Gewirthian Model of Rational Autonomy in Abortion. HEAL Seminar Series. University of Southampton 25 Nov 2015

Rationality, Autonomy, Reproduction
Clayton Thompson, J. 2015. Rationality, Autonomy, Reproduction. LAW DOCTORAL SEMINAR SERIES 2015 . University of Westminster 28 Oct 2015

Revolt, Revolution and Evolution: Reimagining the Principle of Generic Consistency as a Device for Institutional Reform
Clayton Thompson, J. 2015. Revolt, Revolution and Evolution: Reimagining the Principle of Generic Consistency as a Device for Institutional Reform. University of Copenhagen Postgraduate Law Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark 29 Jan 2015

Law, Moral Rationality and Ideals: Modifying the Principle of Generic Consistency to Define Legal ‘Ideals’ as Part of Transparent Autonomy
Clayton Thompson, J. 2014. Law, Moral Rationality and Ideals: Modifying the Principle of Generic Consistency to Define Legal ‘Ideals’ as Part of Transparent Autonomy. Democracy, Rights & Reason(s). University of Westminster 13 Feb 2014

Transgender Freedom and the Law: A Liberal-Poststructural Discussion on McNally
Clayton Thompson, J. and Brooks, V. 2014. Transgender Freedom and the Law: A Liberal-Poststructural Discussion on McNally. Critical Legal Conference. University of Sussex 06 Sep 2014

You Should Never Look a Gift Horse in the Mouth: One-Size-Fits-All Compensation in Wrongful Conception
Clayton Thompson, J. 2012. You Should Never Look a Gift Horse in the Mouth: One-Size-Fits-All Compensation in Wrongful Conception. Westminster Law Review. 2 (1), pp. 73-96.

You Should Never Look a Gift Horse in the Mouth
Clayton Thompson, J. 2012. You Should Never Look a Gift Horse in the Mouth. Westminster Law Review. University of Westminster

Ethics and Loss of Chance in Medical Causation
Clayton Thompson, J. 2011. Ethics and Loss of Chance in Medical Causation. Globalising European Bioethics Education.

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/9w916/task-competency-in-the-rights-analytic-mental-health-and-the-justification-for-rights-and-duties


Share this

Usage statistics

128 total views
0 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.