Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and Latin America: Resurgence and Renewal or Reluctance and Retreat?

Fowler, A. 2024. Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and Latin America: Resurgence and Renewal or Reluctance and Retreat? Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies.

TitleComparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and Latin America: Resurgence and Renewal or Reluctance and Retreat?
TypeJournal article
AuthorsFowler, A.
Abstract

A particular concern in recent years has been the limited options for prosecutions of persons responsible for atrocities in a number of States not amenable to ICC jurisdiction, such as non-state actors in Iraq and government officials in non-ICC members Syria and Myanmar. The need for accountability in such circumstances builds on long histories of human rights practice, spearheaded by the work of the ECtHR and the IACHR mechanisms, and pioneered in large part by the Pinochet case.

One factor has clearly been the limited capacity of the ICC, where even only one investigation takes an exceedingly long time to complete the pre-trial stage, the trial itself, and often an appeal against conviction. Another key factor is undoubtedly the fact of the Russian veto – given it is not an ICC member, Syria and similar candidates can only be referred to the Court by a resolution from the Security Council, a very unlikely prospect given current geopolitics, particularly in the wake of the invasion and occupation of eastern Ukraine.

Accountability thus requires another path, and this is where universal jurisdiction (UJ) can fill the lacuna. Yet UJ as it has been practised has serious limitations. Following Belgium’s cowing by the United States in the late 1990s and early 2000s for its use of UJ in absentia after the latter’s invasion of Iraq, some other previously forum-liberal European states have introduced curbs on cases being initiated by victims themselves, and many jurisdictions now require a jurisdictional link such as nationality of the victim or the accused (the minimum as per the Rome Statute), as well as political agreement to prosecutions going ahead. Further, the vast majority require custody of the accused, thus eliminating the possibility of UJ in absentia. These requirements are steadily turning the exercise of universal jurisdiction into extraterritorial legislation based on active or passive personality rather than ‘true’ universal jurisdiction. Worryingly, it is ensuring politics and foreign relations becomes the arbiter of international justice rather than the nature of the offence, which is a development never intended in the early days of UJ when piracy and hostage taking were the only recognised international crimes. These recent hurdles suggest a worrying future for UJ.

Some commentators observe a resurgence in UJ in recent years based on a number of trials of ex-ISIS members and Syrian regime members in European courts. Latin America has also been busy with its own raft of investigations and prosecutions on the basis of UJ. This article examines and compares the recent uptick in European and Latin American usages of universal jurisdiction, noting the significant headwinds which still need to be overcome in both regions for this avenue of accountability to be utilised effectively.

KeywordsUniversal jurisdiction
war crimes
Latin America
Europe
JournalJournal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies
ISSN1878-1373
1878-1527
Year2024
PublisherBrill
Accepted author manuscript
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)

Related outputs

Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and in Latin America: A Vehicle for International Justice or for Colonial Reckoning?
Fowler, A. 2024. Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and in Latin America: A Vehicle for International Justice or for Colonial Reckoning? The International Journal of Human Rights. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2408591

The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis, 4th edition by Peter Leyland (2021)
Fowler, A. 2023. The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis, 4th edition by Peter Leyland (2021). Public Law Review.

Comparing Australia’s Brereton Inquiry and New Zealand’s Burnham Inquiry: A Discussion
Lloydd, M., Cormier, M., Fowler, A. et al 2023. Comparing Australia’s Brereton Inquiry and New Zealand’s Burnham Inquiry: A Discussion. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law.

Reparations for Afghan Victims of Australian War Crimes
Fowler, A. 2023. Reparations for Afghan Victims of Australian War Crimes. Centre for Law and Social Justice, University of Newcastle, Australia.

The Shadow of Operation Northmoor: Salient Lessons for Australia’s Afghanistan Prosecutions
Fowler, A. 2022. The Shadow of Operation Northmoor: Salient Lessons for Australia’s Afghanistan Prosecutions. Australian International Law Journal. 29 (1), pp. 117-136. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.T2024042600003200053065635

Violations of the Right to Property in Libya and the Promise of Transitional Justice
Fowler, Alexandra and Radan, Mohamed 2022. Violations of the Right to Property in Libya and the Promise of Transitional Justice. International Human Rights Law Review. 11 (1), pp. 62-96. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-11010001

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s Release may Depend on the UK Repaying its Debt to Iran – But can it Lawfully Pay?
Fowler, A. 2021. Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s Release may Depend on the UK Repaying its Debt to Iran – But can it Lawfully Pay? The Conversation.

Repaying Iran that Outstanding £400 million: What does International Law Say?
Fowler, A. 2021. Repaying Iran that Outstanding £400 million: What does International Law Say? The Conversation.

Australian War Crimes in Afghanistan: Prosecutions Face an Uncertain Road Ahead
Fowler, A. 2021. Australian War Crimes in Afghanistan: Prosecutions Face an Uncertain Road Ahead. International Law Association (Australian Branch).

Written Evidence on the Proposal for a Statutory Presumption Against Prosecution of Alleged UK War Crimes after a Period of Five Years
Fowler, A. 2020. Written Evidence on the Proposal for a Statutory Presumption Against Prosecution of Alleged UK War Crimes after a Period of Five Years. UK Parliament.

Blog post: Proposed Amendments to the Human Rights Act to Disadvantage UK War Crimes Victims
Fowler, A. 2020. Blog post: Proposed Amendments to the Human Rights Act to Disadvantage UK War Crimes Victims. OxHRH Blog.

Blog post: UK Accountability for War Crimes in Doubt
Fowler, A. 2020. Blog post: UK Accountability for War Crimes in Doubt. IELR Blog.

More than just 'Protecting Veterans’: How the UK Government Plans to Get Rid of the ECHR in Overseas Operations
Fowler, A. 2020. More than just 'Protecting Veterans’: How the UK Government Plans to Get Rid of the ECHR in Overseas Operations. Verfassungsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20200331-133123-0

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/w3y51/comparing-universal-jurisdiction-in-europe-and-latin-america-resurgence-and-renewal-or-reluctance-and-retreat


Share this

Usage statistics

38 total views
8 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.