Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and in Latin America: A Vehicle for International Justice or for Colonial Reckoning?

Fowler, A. 2024. Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and in Latin America: A Vehicle for International Justice or for Colonial Reckoning? The International Journal of Human Rights. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2408591

TitleComparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and in Latin America: A Vehicle for International Justice or for Colonial Reckoning?
TypeJournal article
AuthorsFowler, A.
Abstract

A particular concern in recent years has been the limited options for prosecutions of persons responsible for atrocities in States not amenable to ICC jurisdiction. The need for accountability for atrocities builds on long histories of human rights and humanitarian law practice, both treaty-based and customary in nature, which has been driven also by the work of the ECtHR and the IACtHR mechanisms. At the domestic level, ever since the Pinochet decision, universal jurisdiction (UJ) has been considered a promising way to fill the lacuna. Indeed, some commentators have observed a resurgence in the use of UJ in recent years based on a number of trials of ex-ISIS and Syrian regime members in European courts. Yet UJ as it has been practised has serious limitations. While there are exceptions, many European states are steadily turning the exercise of UJ into the application of extraterritorial jurisdiction based on active or passive personality, especially in relation to their former colonies. In Latin America too, there have been some recent examples of investigations and prosecutions on the basis of ‘pure’ UJ, but the vast majority of exercises of jurisdiction are in furtherance of extraditions, particularly at the behest of former colonial powers. This article compares the recent uptick in European and Latin American usages of UJ, concluding that to date both regions still exhibit little appetite for pursuing ‘pure’ UJ. It warns that significant colonialist pressures in both regions threaten to limit this crucial mechanism for international justice.

JournalThe International Journal of Human Rights
ISSN1364-2987
1744-053X
Year2024
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Publisher's version
License
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2408591
Publication dates
Published online03 Nov 2024

Related outputs

Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and Latin America: Resurgence and Renewal or Reluctance and Retreat?
Fowler, A. 2024. Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and Latin America: Resurgence and Renewal or Reluctance and Retreat? Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies.

The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis, 4th edition by Peter Leyland (2021)
Fowler, A. 2023. The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis, 4th edition by Peter Leyland (2021). Public Law Review.

Comparing Australia’s Brereton Inquiry and New Zealand’s Burnham Inquiry: A Discussion
Lloydd, M., Cormier, M., Fowler, A. et al 2023. Comparing Australia’s Brereton Inquiry and New Zealand’s Burnham Inquiry: A Discussion. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law.

Reparations for Afghan Victims of Australian War Crimes
Fowler, A. 2023. Reparations for Afghan Victims of Australian War Crimes. Centre for Law and Social Justice, University of Newcastle, Australia.

The Shadow of Operation Northmoor: Salient Lessons for Australia’s Afghanistan Prosecutions
Fowler, A. 2022. The Shadow of Operation Northmoor: Salient Lessons for Australia’s Afghanistan Prosecutions. Australian International Law Journal. 29 (1), pp. 117-136. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.T2024042600003200053065635

Violations of the Right to Property in Libya and the Promise of Transitional Justice
Fowler, Alexandra and Radan, Mohamed 2022. Violations of the Right to Property in Libya and the Promise of Transitional Justice. International Human Rights Law Review. 11 (1), pp. 62-96. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-11010001

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s Release may Depend on the UK Repaying its Debt to Iran – But can it Lawfully Pay?
Fowler, A. 2021. Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s Release may Depend on the UK Repaying its Debt to Iran – But can it Lawfully Pay? The Conversation.

Repaying Iran that Outstanding £400 million: What does International Law Say?
Fowler, A. 2021. Repaying Iran that Outstanding £400 million: What does International Law Say? The Conversation.

Australian War Crimes in Afghanistan: Prosecutions Face an Uncertain Road Ahead
Fowler, A. 2021. Australian War Crimes in Afghanistan: Prosecutions Face an Uncertain Road Ahead. International Law Association (Australian Branch).

Written Evidence on the Proposal for a Statutory Presumption Against Prosecution of Alleged UK War Crimes after a Period of Five Years
Fowler, A. 2020. Written Evidence on the Proposal for a Statutory Presumption Against Prosecution of Alleged UK War Crimes after a Period of Five Years. UK Parliament.

Blog post: Proposed Amendments to the Human Rights Act to Disadvantage UK War Crimes Victims
Fowler, A. 2020. Blog post: Proposed Amendments to the Human Rights Act to Disadvantage UK War Crimes Victims. OxHRH Blog.

Blog post: UK Accountability for War Crimes in Doubt
Fowler, A. 2020. Blog post: UK Accountability for War Crimes in Doubt. IELR Blog.

More than just 'Protecting Veterans’: How the UK Government Plans to Get Rid of the ECHR in Overseas Operations
Fowler, A. 2020. More than just 'Protecting Veterans’: How the UK Government Plans to Get Rid of the ECHR in Overseas Operations. Verfassungsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20200331-133123-0

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/wwx3v/comparing-universal-jurisdiction-in-europe-and-in-latin-america-a-vehicle-for-international-justice-or-for-colonial-reckoning


Share this

Usage statistics

15 total views
4 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.