Reparations for Victims of Genocide: The Case for Substantive ICJ Awards

Fowler, A. 2026. Reparations for Victims of Genocide: The Case for Substantive ICJ Awards. Journal of Genocide Research. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2026.2700169

TitleReparations for Victims of Genocide: The Case for Substantive ICJ Awards
TypeJournal article
AuthorsFowler, A.
Abstract

It is clear that violations of international law are expected to result in reparations, and there is hardly a violation of international law worse than genocide. This article confirms the need to repair genocide and notes the challenges faced in awarding various types of reparations, particularly for large groups. Distinguishing current International Court of Justice (ICJ) cases on genocide from the Court’s previous approach in Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro), it then argues that – should the merits support it – an award of substantive and not merely declaratory damages is necessary to repair these victims. Given that there is no precedent for a substantive award in erga omnes cases on the basis of parens patriae, the Court must recognize a new type of mechanism, formulated in conjunction with the United Nations, which will allow reparations to be disseminated amongst eligible victims who are not nationals of the applicant state. Only if there is substantive reparation of victims can it be claimed that the outcome will serve the interests of justice and contribute in real terms to the Convention’s mission to prevent the “crime of crimes.”

JournalJournal of Genocide Research
ISSN1462-3528
1469-9494
Year2026
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Publisher's version
License
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File Access Level
Open (open metadata and files)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2026.2700169
Publication dates
Published online12 Jul 2026

Related outputs

Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and in Latin America: A Vehicle for International Justice or for Colonial Reckoning?
Fowler, A. 2025. Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and in Latin America: A Vehicle for International Justice or for Colonial Reckoning? The International Journal of Human Rights. 29 (4), pp. 736-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2408591

Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and Latin America: Resurgence and Renewal or Reluctance and Retreat?
Fowler, A. 2024. Comparing Universal Jurisdiction in Europe and Latin America: Resurgence and Renewal or Reluctance and Retreat? Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies.

The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis, 4th edition by Peter Leyland (2021)
Fowler, A. 2023. The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis, 4th edition by Peter Leyland (2021). Public Law Review.

Comparing Australia’s Brereton Inquiry and New Zealand’s Burnham Inquiry: A Discussion
Lloydd, M., Cormier, M., Fowler, A. et al 2023. Comparing Australia’s Brereton Inquiry and New Zealand’s Burnham Inquiry: A Discussion. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law.

Reparations for Afghan Victims of Australian War Crimes
Fowler, A. 2023. Reparations for Afghan Victims of Australian War Crimes. Centre for Law and Social Justice, University of Newcastle, Australia.

The Shadow of Operation Northmoor: Salient Lessons for Australia’s Afghanistan Prosecutions
Fowler, A. 2022. The Shadow of Operation Northmoor: Salient Lessons for Australia’s Afghanistan Prosecutions. Australian International Law Journal. 29 (1), pp. 117-136. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.T2024042600003200053065635

Violations of the Right to Property in Libya and the Promise of Transitional Justice
Fowler, Alexandra and Radan, Mohamed 2022. Violations of the Right to Property in Libya and the Promise of Transitional Justice. International Human Rights Law Review. 11 (1), pp. 62-96. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-11010001

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s Release may Depend on the UK Repaying its Debt to Iran – But can it Lawfully Pay?
Fowler, A. 2021. Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s Release may Depend on the UK Repaying its Debt to Iran – But can it Lawfully Pay? The Conversation.

Repaying Iran that Outstanding £400 million: What does International Law Say?
Fowler, A. 2021. Repaying Iran that Outstanding £400 million: What does International Law Say? The Conversation.

Australian War Crimes in Afghanistan: Prosecutions Face an Uncertain Road Ahead
Fowler, A. 2021. Australian War Crimes in Afghanistan: Prosecutions Face an Uncertain Road Ahead. International Law Association (Australian Branch).

Written Evidence on the Proposal for a Statutory Presumption Against Prosecution of Alleged UK War Crimes after a Period of Five Years
Fowler, A. 2020. Written Evidence on the Proposal for a Statutory Presumption Against Prosecution of Alleged UK War Crimes after a Period of Five Years. UK Parliament.

Blog post: Proposed Amendments to the Human Rights Act to Disadvantage UK War Crimes Victims
Fowler, A. 2020. Blog post: Proposed Amendments to the Human Rights Act to Disadvantage UK War Crimes Victims. OxHRH Blog.

Blog post: UK Accountability for War Crimes in Doubt
Fowler, A. 2020. Blog post: UK Accountability for War Crimes in Doubt. IELR Blog.

More than just 'Protecting Veterans’: How the UK Government Plans to Get Rid of the ECHR in Overseas Operations
Fowler, A. 2020. More than just 'Protecting Veterans’: How the UK Government Plans to Get Rid of the ECHR in Overseas Operations. Verfassungsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20200331-133123-0

Permalink - https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/x801x/reparations-for-victims-of-genocide-the-case-for-substantive-icj-awards


Share this

Usage statistics

0 total views
0 total downloads
These values cover views and downloads from WestminsterResearch and are for the period from September 2nd 2018, when this repository was created.