Abstract | The limitations of autopsy in the diagnosis of death due to ischemic heart disease are well known. In the living, a simple reliable biochemical assay for cardiac troponins is used in the diagnosis of acute myocardial ischemia. Several studies have investigated the use of biochemical assays for cardiac troponins in postmortem subjects as a means to distinguish between a cardiac and anoncardiac cause of death. All of these studies, however, rely upon assigning subjects to "cardiac" or "noncardiac" death on the basis of a postmortem examination. As postmortem examination does not always accurately distinguish between these two groups, this approach is intrinsically flawed. Our study compares antemortem and postmortem cardiac troponin levels in five subjects. The antemortem samples were retrieved from the hospital biochemistry laboratory after each subject's death. The postmortem samples for each subject were taken from different sites and at different times during the early postmortem period.Erratic results bearing little or no relation to the antemortem cardiac troponin level were obtained for all subjects. Four of the five subjects had raised antemortem troponin levels, although only one had a cardiac cause of death. From this, we conclude that postmortem blood is not a suitable substrate for standard biochemical assays of cardiac troponins, which are designed for use on serum taken from living patients. In addition, the results of our study support the view that elevated cardiac troponins are a marker of serious morbidity and are not specific for cardiac injury as the primary cause of morbidity or mortality. |
---|