| Abstract | In 1951, the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) published a Greek translation of the Selected Works of Marx and Engels which included a statement on the work practices followed for its creation, i.e. that it was the product of teamwork. Adopting a Foucauldian perspective, the paper considers work practices as processes of validated knowledge production and responds to the conference theme ‘translation and interpreting as labour, work, and action’. Based on KKE publications and archival material, it investigates how work practices were enacted to generate the “correct” translation of Marxist texts. It will be argued that the party’s efforts to dominate Marxist discourse entailed the codification of the theory and the creation of definitive translations aimed at being accepted as “correct”. To this end, the party instructed on the appropriate method to translate, and established an organisational model for the translation of Marxist texts, which encompassed a web of accountabilities of contributors. The team of contributors to the translation were political refugees who had fled Greece in the aftermath of the party’s defeat in the Civil War (1946-1949) and worked as professionals, that is, as salaried employees of the party, for the sole purpose of producing translations. Their work was organised hierarchically and centralised in the party’s newly established Translation Department in Bucharest, and involved positions such as translators, revisers and supervisors of translation projects. The paper will discuss how the party’s collaborative, centralised and professionalised organisational model alongside mechanisms of surveillance and discipline of contributors supported its claims of owning the “correct” interpretation of Marxism. The resulting translations would be presented as accurate, fluent and objective renderings of their originals, which preserved the authors’ style. Only knowledge produced according to this method would be authorised and available to readers. This approach to translator work practices advances our understanding of the construction of Marxist discourse and of the relationship between social structures, power and processes of validated knowledge production. |
|---|
| Keywords | Translation of Marxism, Marxism and Greece, translator work practices, processes of knowledge validation, history of knowledge, translation process, collaborative translation, institutional translation |
|---|